Abstract
The use of variable copulative prefixes in copulative structures is an unusual phenomenon, since a verbal element—in this case a subject agreement morpheme—is prefixed directly to a nonverbal complement. In this article it is argued that these prefixes are the grammaticalized remnants of full copulative verbs. This point of view is illustrated by means of both synchronic and diachronic evidence. It is furthermore indicated that the semantic nature of the copulative verb stem -le and its inability to take the normal inflections for tense and aspect are contributing factors to its deletion from copulative structures.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
