Abstract
For a complicated banking system with various financial attributes, there are usually different classifications of inputs and outputs from the perspectives of different stakeholders. In order to obtain the highest efficiency score, different perspectives tend to select different weight assignment schemes, even in evaluating the same bank. In order to balance multiple perspectives (Pareto optimality) based on their market statuses and evaluate DMU more objectively, we propose a new DEA model incorporating Nash bargaining game (NBG) theory, which focuses on seeking an identical weight assignment scheme to cater to multiple perspectives.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Applied Management Science
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
