Abstract
The social investment approach explicitly and implicitly addresses gender issues in its proposals for reforming welfare states. It promotes women's labour force participation and suggests a re-drawing of family-state boundaries in the responsibility towards children as human capital. While appreciating the support for work-family policies and for a public responsibility in investing on children from an early age, I argue that the ideal adult worker model that underlies this approach hides, and to some degree even takes for granted, gender inequalities in both the household and the labour market. The social investment approach also undervalues the subjective and relational meaning of caring within households, while attributing to families a mainly functional role regarding societies and labour markets. In so doing, the approach causes new tensions for men and women and possibly new inequalities among women, as well as among men.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
