Abstract
This essay is a literary case-study of the short-story writer Henry Lawson in 1890s Sydney. A book-historical habit of attention to the material circumstances of the original productions is brought to bear. Once the historical and biographical background is established, the essay is shaped around two exemplary acts of Lawson reception, which are simultaneously examples of traditional literary-critical discourse getting into trouble. The critics make certain judgements about what they take to be aesthetic problems, not realizing that they could be fundamentally clarified on a material or book-historical basis. The broader aim of the essay is to raise questions about the role of book-historical method in literary criticism—or, at least, in literary criticism as it could be conducted in the future if the dispersed strands of the neglected concept of the work were regathered and rethought.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.