Abstract

In this note we show by an example that the answer is negative, namely that f. —g, does not always hold. We also consider the case R = K[G^ where K is a field, and show that the answer is negative if and only if the characteristic of the field K divides the order of G when G is a finite group. We also obtain some condition for an infinite group G. If 1. 1 were true, then the arguments of Morimoto in [3], which computes a homology class of the torsion invariant (cf, Theorem 8. 4 of Dovermann-Rothenberg [2]), would be considerably simplified. Thus the negativeness of 1. 1 suggests that we cannot do without delicate arguments as in [3] in computing torsion invariants. The author would like to thank M. Morimoto, T. Matumoto and K. Motose for valuable conversations. He would also like to thank

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.