Abstract
ABSTRACTIn this study, we reconsider weighted distribution from the perspective of missing mechanism since weighted distribution instead of being the distribution of the whole population of interest is only the distribution of respondents (sub-population). After defining some weighted distributions by different mechanisms for indicator of response, we show, by some simulation studies, that using weighted distributions may lead to biased estimates of parameters under the non-ignorable missing mechanism. On the other hand, joint modeling of the response and selection mechanism could result in more efficient and valid estimates of parameters. The lower root of mean squared errors of estimates from the joint modeling approach than those of the weighted distribution is a warranty to the statement that the joint modeling method is more efficient than weighted distribution; this is proved by diverse simulation studies along the article. However, these two methods of the weighted approach and joint modeling give similar results if the selection mechanism is at random. Finally, the methods are applied and compared in the analysis of one well-used real dataset.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
