A Comparison of the Convenience, Quality of Interaction, and Satisfaction of Virtual and In-Person Healthcare Consultations: A Nationwide Study.

Abstract

Background: There are few direct comparisons of service utilization and patient-reported outcomes in patients attending medical consultations in person or virtually. This was a prospective, cross-sectional study of adults engaging with a healthcare practitioner via virtual or in-person consultations. Methods: Participants were recruited in person by convenience sampling between November 2023 and January 2024 across Saudi Arabia, and data were gathered on (i) basic demographic and consultation information and (ii) convenience, quality of interaction, and satisfaction with their consultations. Results: Of 3196 individuals who completed the survey, 28.7% had attended their most recent healthcare interaction virtually and 71.3% had attended in person. Participants attending virtual consultations were more likely to live rurally (69.0% vs. 21.9% for in-person consultations; p < 0.001). Virtual appointments were more common for primary care and diabetes/endocrinology but not surgical specialties (p < 0.001), and private apps and hospitals more frequently provided virtual appointments. Conclusions: Overall, patients found virtual consultations to be significantly more convenient, prompt, private, and well communicated than in-person appointments, translating into extremely high satisfaction (97.4% overall vs. 84.0% for in-person consultations; p < 0.001). This study provides population-level data on the current prevalence of telehealth use in Saudi Arabia. Further prospective research demonstrating the clinical noninferiority of telemedicine could help promote further uptake in specialties such as surgery.