Abstract
There is now in the literature a number of mathematical models of the effects of flow on crystallization of polymers, and here we compare the performance of various models in slow simple shearing and sinusoidal strain (oscillatory) flows. We compare the model predictions to the experiments of Wassner and Maier [E. Wassner, R.-D. Maier, Shear-induced crystallization of polypropylene melts. in: D.M. Binding, et al. (Ed.), Proceedings of the XIII International Congress on Rheology, Cambridge, 2000, pp. 1–183] on isotactic polypropylene. Both the Kolmogorov [A.N. Kolmogorov, On the statistics of the crystallization process on metals. Bull. Akad. Sci. USSR, Class Sci., Math. Nat. 1 (1937) 355–359] and Nakamura et al. [K. Nakamura, T. Watanabe, K. Katayama, T. Amano, Some aspects of non-isothermal crystallization of polymers I, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 16 (1972) 1077–1091] crystallinity formulations are discussed, and the advantages of the former are emphasized. For the cases considered, we see that strain-based crystallinity enhancement formulations appear to give results close to the experiments at the low flow rates which were studied, although they have some drawbacks. Several other ideas also lead to acceptable results; a new formulation based on both strain and strain-rate appears to give the best overall fit.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.