A comparison of nutritional regulation in solitarious- and gregarious-phase nymphs of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria.

Abstract

Nutritional regulatory responses were compared for the cryptic 'solitarious' and the conspicuously coloured, aggregating 'gregarious' phases of the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria. The desert locust has the genetic potential to exist in either phase, changing between them within a lifetime and epigenetically across generations. Our aim was to compare final-instar nymphs of the two phases with respect to key nutritional variables, including (i) points of regulated intake (the 'intake target') for protein and carbohydrate, (ii) the nature of trade-offs between over-eating nutrients in excess and under-eating those in deficit when fed nutritionally unbalanced foods, (iii) diet-related patterns of nutrient utilisation, and (iv) the performance consequences of eating nutritionally unbalanced diets. When provided with pairs of nutritionally unbalanced but complementary foods, both phases regulated their intake of protein and carbohydrate to a similar point. However, when confined to foods that were of unbalanced protein to carbohydrate ratio, gregarious nymphs ate more than solitarious insects. Both phases regulated protein growth, but gregarious insects did so to a lower adult body protein content and converted ingested protein to growth less efficiently. When fed a food high in carbohydrate and low in protein, gregarious nymphs deposited more body lipid and survived less well than did solitarious insects. Solitarious nymphs developed more quickly than gregarious nymphs except on the two most extremely unbalanced diets, on which development time was similar. The results are discussed with respect to the different nutritional ecologies of the two phases and used to develop the hypothesis that animals have evolved to trade-off the cost of eating excess of a nutritionally unbalanced diet against the probability of encountering foods of complementary composition in the future.