Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of body fat determinations and subsequent calculation of minimal weight (MW) by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), bioelectrical impedance (BIA), near-infrared photospectometry (NIR), and anthropometry (LOHMAN). Necessitated by mandatory state minimal weight testing, the methods were cross-validated on 95 Wisconsin high school wrestlers (mean +/- SD; age: 15.1 +/- 1.2 yr, height: 170.4 +/- 7.1 cm, weight: 63.4 +/- 9.8 kg). MW, defined as fat-free body/0.93, determined by hydrostatic weighing (HW) and residual volume via O2 dilution, served as the criterion. The validity of the four selected MW predictions were evaluated against HW by examining mean differences (MD), standard deviation differences (SDD), correlations (r), standard error of estimate (SEE), and total errors (TE). Statistically significant differences were shown between the methods and the criterion by t-tests; however, these were clinically small in Lohman (0.6 kg) and BIA (0.9 kg). TE ranged from 2.25 kg (Lohman) to 6.03 kg (NIR). The results indicated that Lohman skinfold equation provided the most accurate prediction of MW, demonstrating the highest correlation (0.972), lowest MD (0.6 kg), lowest SEE (2.12 kg), and lowest TE (2.25 kg) of the methods evaluated.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
