Abstract
AbstractThe data from 12 individual cattle grazed on a uniform sward were used to compare field sampling of faeces with three time‐schedules for rectal sampling of faeces. Estimates of digestibility from a faecal nitrogen equation were compared with estimates based on in vitro digestibility, or modified acid‐detergent fibre determinations, on clipped herbage samples.Field sampling gave a lower coefficient of variation (8%) in chromic oxide content than did grab sampling (14%). Grab sampling introduced an upward bias in estimates of faecal output compared with field samples. The estimate of digestibility based on the faecal index was intermediate to those based on clip samples from the upper and lower horizons of the sward. There was no difference in the mean digestibilities estimated from in vitro or MAD fibre.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
