Abstract

Multirotor is the umbrella term for the family of unmanned aircraft, which include the quadrotor, hexarotor and other vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) aircraft that employ multiple main rotors for lift and control. Development and testing of novel multirotor designs has been aided by the proliferation of 3D printing and inexpensive flight controllers and components. Different multirotor configurations exhibit specific strengths, while presenting unique challenges with regards to design and control. This article highlights the primary differences between three multirotor platforms: a quadrotor; a fully-actuated hexarotor; and an octorotor. Each platform is modelled and then controlled using non-linear dynamic inversion. The differences in dynamics, control and performance are then discussed.

Highlights

  • A multirotor is a rotorcraft, but differ from traditional helicopter configurations

  • This paper presents a comparison of three specific multirotor platforms: quadrotor, hexarotor and octorotor

  • Applications of the various platforms range from simple control investigation to state estimation to fault tolerant control strategies. While these investigations are indicative of those performed on the quadrotor, the literature highlights a lack of discussion on the differences of multirotor platforms with regards to such investigations

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A multirotor is a rotorcraft, but differ from traditional helicopter configurations. Rather than employing mechanically-complex main and tail rotors, a multirotor employs several identical rotors to provide both lift and control. The primary benefit of this approach in the context of obtaining consistent system performance across a range of platforms is that it transforms a non-linear multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) system into a series of linear single-input single-output (SISO) systems. The performances of these linear systems are specified through simple pole placement or, if desired, more complex control laws [2]. Taking the quadrotor as the baseline system, a discussion is presented on the changes to the vehicle dynamics, controller and closed-loop performance as a result of augmenting the aircraft with additional rotors. It is seen through simulation testing that the actuator limits in each system limit the ability of each system to exhibit identical performance

Review of the Literature
Multirotor Platforms
NDI Control of Multirotors
Multirotor Dynamics
Shared Properties
Rigid Body Model
Rotor Model
General Model Description and Control Allocation
The Quadrotor
The Hexarotor
The Octorotor
Controller Design
Non-Linear Dynamic Inversion
State Feedback Control
Control of the Quadrotor
Control of the Hexarotor
Control of the Octorotor
Operational Differences Between Configurations
Controller Gains and Trajectory Definition
Control Effort During Accurate Trajectory Tracking
Tracking Performance During Specific Manoeuvres
Fast Horizontal Translation
Fast Yaw Rotation
Fast 4D Manoeuvre
Discussion and Conclusions
Discussion
Conclusions
Further Work
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.