Abstract

Acoustic event detection and analysis has been widely developed in the last few years for its valuable application in monitoring elderly or dependant people, for surveillance issues, for multimedia retrieval, or even for biodiversity metrics in natural environments. For this purpose, sound source identification is a key issue to give a smart technological answer to all the aforementioned applications. Diverse types of sounds and variate environments, together with a number of challenges in terms of application, widen the choice of artificial intelligence algorithm proposal. This paper presents a comparative study on combining several feature extraction algorithms (Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC), Gammatone Cepstrum Coefficients (GTCC), and Narrow Band (NB)) with a group of machine learning algorithms (k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), Neural Networks (NN), and Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM)), tested over five different acoustic environments. This work has the goal of detailing a best practice method and evaluate the reliability of this general-purpose algorithm for all the classes. Preliminary results show that most of the combinations of feature extraction and machine learning present acceptable results in most of the described corpora. Nevertheless, there is a combination that outperforms the others: the use of GTCC together with kNN, and its results are further analyzed for all the corpora.

Highlights

  • Years after the first surveillance systems, mainly based on camera networks [1], privacy issues started to arise [2], and, for many applications, the change from image detection in indoor or outdoor spaces tended to move to acoustic sensor networks [3], less intrusive for the life of citizens and with a wide spectrum of possibilities in terms of identification of events

  • Gammatone Cepstrum Coefficients (GTCC) outdoes Mel Frequency Cepstrum Coefficients (MFCC) in all but one simulation, i.e., when it is used in conjunction with the k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm on the birds dataset

  • NB-Auto-Correlation Features (ACF) proves to be an optimal solution in some datasets but only when it is paired with kNN

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Years after the first surveillance systems, mainly based on camera networks [1], privacy issues started to arise [2], and, for many applications, the change from image detection in indoor or outdoor spaces tended to move to acoustic sensor networks [3], less intrusive for the life of citizens and with a wide spectrum of possibilities in terms of identification of events. Audio event detection (AED) and classification is of the upmost importance in several environments and applications. Identification of certain indoor sounds has been useful in several surveillance contexts, especially those related to human activity [4]. It helps in monitoring old or dependant people at home and triggering an alarm when some specific event is detected. Unobtrusive AED in smart homes has direct applications in ambient assisted living [5]. Identifying sounds related to breaking into houses or violent acts associated to crime or even terrorism has obvious security applications [6]

Objectives
Results
Conclusion

Full Text

Published Version
Open DOI Link

Get access to 115M+ research papers

Discover from 40M+ Open access, 2M+ Pre-prints, 9.5M Topics and 32K+ Journals.

Sign Up Now! It's FREE

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call