Abstract

BACKGROUND An ulcer is not a serious health problem for the patient but a major health concern due to discomfort, pain, loss of workdays, and treatment cost. Several treatment modalities are available in treating ulcers based on their aetiology. In most ulcer management, povidone-iodine has been used for a very long duration with good results. On the other hand, silver, an antibacterial and anti-inammatory agent, is a newer treatment modality. In this study, we wanted to evaluate and compareAims and Objectives the healing of an ulcer in patients treated with silver x foam and betadine with regard to the progress of healing and duration, and rate of healing in both methods. This was a comparative study conducted after obtaining approval from the ethical committeeMATERIALS AND METHODS of Rangaraya Medical College and Government General Hospital, Kakinada, in the Department of General Surgery, over two years from June 2018 to May 2020 among patients suffering from non-healing ulcer who attended the general surgery outpatient department of Government General Hospital, Kakinada. The advantage of silver foam dressings is that they can be changed every 4th or 5th day when comparedRESULTS to betadine, which requires daily or alternate day dressings. Silver foam dressings show better control of infection and rate ofCONCLUSION healing when compared to povidone-iodine in the management of all patients with ulcers.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.