Abstract
Metaheuristic algorithms have proved to be good solvers for the traveling salesman problem (TSP). All metaheuristics usually encounter problems on which they perform poorly so the programmer must gain experience on which optimizers work well in different classes of problems. However due to the unique functionality of each type of meta-heuristic, comparison of metaheuristics is in many ways more difficult than other algorithmic comparisons. In this paper, solution to the traveling salesman problem was implemented using genetic algorithm and simulated annealing. These algorithms were compared based on performance and results using several benchmarks. It was observed that Simulated Annealing runs faster than Genetic Algorithm and runtime of Genetic Algorithm increases exponentially with number of cities. However, in terms of solution quality Genetic Algorithm is better than Simulated Annealing.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Applied Information Systems
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
