Abstract
IoT deployments for smart cities and smart buildings have been multiplying exponentially in recent years, benefiting from a steady rise in the number of new technologies that deal with the underlying networking and application challenges in indoor and outdoor spaces. Due to the overlap in their specifications, we are still trying to figure out which of these technologies fits better to certain application domains, such as building monitoring. In this work, we provide a comparative study between IEEE 802.15.4 and LoRa, based on our experiences from using both wireless networking technologies in the context of indoor deployments aimed at IoT-enabled school buildings in Europe. We provide an apples-to-apples comparison between the two technologies, comparing them in some cases in the same building and application context. Although these two technologies initially might not seem to be competing in the same application space, in practice we found out that both have strengths and weaknesses in the specific application domain we have been using them. Moreover, our LoRa-based networking implementation, on top of Arduino-based hardware, appears to be an option that allows for a robust, reliable and lower overall cost IoT deployment, especially in cases with multi-floor building installations and low bandwidth requirements. We also present a network-level dataset produced from our installations and upon which we based our findings and discussion. We provide data collected from 6 different school buildings, 8 networks and 49 devices, to compare the performance and cost-effectiveness of competing IoT technologies. In that effect, with LoRa we can achieve similar or better link quality to IEEE 802.15.4, with higher data rate and lower costs.
Highlights
The Internet of Things (IoT) is quickly transforming the ways we work and live, accelerating the pace in which the real and the digital world interconnect
We present a thorough comparison between LoRa and IEEE 802.15.4 as the backbone of an IoT deployment inside school buildings
The experiments included in this paper demonstrate that, for our specific application and under the respective design constraints, LoRa can be more reliable in terms of actual data delivery rate, and it can be adequate in terms of data rate, delivering basically the same volume of sensing data as IEEE 802.15.4 but at a lower overall cost, due to requiring a less complex network topology
Summary
The Internet of Things (IoT) is quickly transforming the ways we work and live, accelerating the pace in which the real and the digital world interconnect. The experiments included in this paper demonstrate that, for our specific application and under the respective design constraints, LoRa can be more reliable in terms of actual data delivery rate, and it can be adequate in terms of data rate, delivering basically the same volume of sensing data as IEEE 802.15.4 but at a lower overall cost, due to requiring a less complex network topology In this sense, we showcase that LoRa can be a good alternative to other existing approaches for implementing applications that are not typical LPWAN use cases, i.e., with a rather small number of nodes inside a building, when configured suitably.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
