A Comparative Study of Biomass and Carbon Stock in Tropical and Temperate Forests of Ilam District in Nepal
Quantification of biomass and carbon is imperative in optimizing ecological and low-carbon emission-oriented economic benefits of forestland. This study quantified stock densities of carbon in two distinct forests, viz., tropical and temperate. We selected two Community Forests (CFs) with predominance of Shorea robusta in the tropical and Castanopsis sp. in the temperate region of Ilam district (Chure and Mid-hill). Data were gathered using stratified systematic sampling with a 1% sampling intensity. It was discovered that the overall stock (carbon) in the Tropical and Temperate CFs was 95 Mg ha-1 and 75.59 Mg ha-1, respectively. Tropical forests exhibited a higher level of biomass (202.14 Mg ha-¹) relative to temperate forests (169.34 Mg ha-¹). The biomass carbon in tropical forests was 1.19 times greater (per hectare) compared to temperate forests. Interestingly, analysis revealed an absence of significant differences in carbon sequestration between the two forests under study with respect to diameter and height class. The study shows that both tropical and temperate forest stands sequester a significant amount of carbon, and appropriate management can yield additional benefits.
- Research Article
49
- 10.1111/gcb.12423
- Apr 19, 2014
- Global Change Biology
Evaluating the tropical forest carbon sink
- Research Article
- 10.1007/s11676-025-01824-z
- Feb 6, 2025
- Journal of Forestry Research
The study determined the carbon stocks and litter nutrient concentration in tropical forests along the ecological gradient in Kenya. This could help understand the potential of mitigating climate change using tropical forest ecosystems in different ecological zones, which are being affected by climate change to a level that they are becoming carbon sources instead of sinks. Stratified sampling technique was used to categorize tropical forests into rain, moist deciduous and dry zone forests depending on the average annual rainfall received. Simple random sampling technique was used to select three tropical forests in each category. Modified consistent sampling technique was used to develop 10 main 20 m × 100 m plots in each forest, with 20 2 m × 50 m sub-plots in each plot. Systematic random sampling technique was used in selecting 10 sub-plots from each main plot for inventory study. Non-destructive approach based on allometric equations using trees’ diameter at breast height (DBH), total height and species’ wood specific gravity were used in estimating tree carbon stock in each forest. Soil organic carbon (SOC) and litter nutrient concentration (total phosphorus and nitrogen) were determined in each forest based on standard laboratory procedures. The results indicated that, whilst trees in rain forests recorded a significantly higher (p < 0.001) DBH (20.36 cm) and total tree height (12.1 m), trees in dry zone forests recorded a significantly higher (p < 0.001) specific gravity (0.67 kg m−3). Dry zone tropical forests stored a significantly lower amount of total tree carbon of 73 Mg ha−1, compared to tropical rain forests (439.5 Mg ha−1) and moist deciduous tropical forests (449 Mg ha−1). The SOC content was significantly higher in tropical rainforests (3.9%), compared to soils from moist deciduous (2.9%) and dry zone forests (1.8%). While litter from tropical rain forests recorded a significantly higher amount of total nitrogen (3.4%), litter from dry zone forests recorded a significantly higher concentration of total phosphorus (0.27%). In conclusion, ecological gradient that is dictated by the prevailing temperatures and precipitation affects the tropical forests carbon stock potential and litter nutrient concentration. This implies that, the changing climate is having a serious implication on the ecosystem services such as carbon stock and nutrients cycling in tropical forests.
- Research Article
50
- 10.1007/s10329-012-0341-3
- Jan 25, 2013
- Primates
In order to understand the ecological adaptations of primates to survive in temperate forests, we need to know the general patterns of plant phenology in temperate and tropical forests. Comparative analyses have been employed to investigate general trends in the seasonality and abundance of fruit and young leaves in tropical and temperate forests. Previous studies have shown that (1) fruit fall biomass in temperate forest is lower than in tropical forest, (2) non-fleshy species, in particular acorns, comprise the majority of the fruit biomass in temperate forest, (3) the duration of the fruiting season is shorter in temperate forest, and (4) the fruiting peak occurs in autumn in most temperate forests. Through our comparative analyses of the fruiting and flushing phenology between Asian temperate and tropical forests, we revealed that (1) fruiting is more annually periodic (the pattern in oneyear is similar to that seen in the next year) in temperate forest in terms of the number of fruiting species or trees, (2) there is no consistent difference in interannual variations in fruiting between temperate and tropical forests, although some oak-dominated temperate forests exhibit extremely large interannual variations in fruiting, (3) the timing of the flushing peak is predictable (in spring and early summer), and (4) the duration of the flushing season is shorter. The flushing season in temperate forests (17-28% of that in tropical forests) was quite limited, even compared to the fruiting season (68%). These results imply that temperate primates need to survive a long period of scarcity of young leaves and fruits, but the timing is predictable. Therefore, a dependence on low-quality foods, such as mature leaves, buds, bark, and lichens, would be indispensable for temperate primates. Due to the high predictability of the timing of fruiting and flushing in temperate forests, fat accumulation during the fruit-abundant period and fat metabolization during the subsequent fruit-scarce period can be an effective strategy to survive the lean period (winter).
- Research Article
159
- 10.1098/rsta.2002.1023
- Jun 25, 2002
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences
The many opportunities for mitigating atmospheric carbon emissions in developing countries include reforesting degraded lands, implementing sustainable agricultural practices on existing lands and slowing tropical deforestation. This analysis shows that over the next 10 years, 48 major tropical and subtropical developing countries have the potential to reduce the atmospheric carbon burden by about 2.3 billion tonnes of carbon. Given a central price of $10 per tonne of carbon and a discount rate of 3%, this mitigation would generate a net present value of about $16.8 billion collectively for these countries. Achieving these potentials would require a significant global effort, covering more than 50 million hectares of land, to implement carbon-friendly practices in agriculture, forest and previously forested lands. These estimates of host-country income potentials do not consider that outside financial investment may or may not be available. Our calculations take no account of the additional benefits of carbon sequestration in forest soils undergoing reforestation, increased use of biomass and reduced use of fossil-fuel inputs and reduced agricultural emissions. In all events, realizing these incomes would necessitate substantially greater policy support and investment in sustainable land uses than is currently the case.
- Research Article
- 10.55863/ijees.2022.0012
- Feb 27, 2022
- International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Carbon stock and soil CO 2 flux in the vegetation-soil components were assessed in tropical, sub-tropical and temperate forest ecosystems of Manipur, Northeast India. Carbon stock in the aboveground biomass was recorded to be highest in the sub-tropical forest (319.18 Mg ha -1 ) followed by temperate (54.45 Mg ha -1 ) and tropical forest (38.35 Mg ha -1 ) whereas soil organic carbon stock was highest in temperate forest (65.13 Mg ha -1 ) and lowest in tropical forest (21.64 Mg ha -1 ) up to the depth of 1m. The rates of carbon sequestration was in the order of the tropical>temperate> sub- tropical forest and the rate of soil CO 2 flux was estimated to be highest in tropical and lowest in temperate forest. Regression analysis shows that annual soil CO 2 flux was highly influenced by soil moisture, soil temperature and soil organic carbon as well as by C stocks in aboveground biomass. The annual carbon budget of the tropical, sub-tropical and temperate forest shows that 11.41 Mg C ha -1 ,9.84 Mg C ha -1 and 10.34 Mg C ha -1 was captured by the vegetation through photosynthesis, while 10.36 Mg C ha -1 ,5.84 Mg C ha -1 and 8.07 Mg C ha -1 was released into the atmosphere through CO 2 emissions from soil due to root and microbial respiration thereby a net balance of 1.05 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 ,1.77 Mg C ha -1 yr -1 and 2.27 not ( 4.50) Mg C ha -1 yr -1 was being retained in the forest ecosystems. Thus our study indicates that these forests have a huge potential in the reduction of carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere and could be used as C-sinks in the Northeast India depending upon the level of protection.
- Research Article
- 10.55779/nsb14311279
- Sep 23, 2022
- Notulae Scientia Biologicae
Tropical forests act as a great carbon reservoir covering about 30% of the global carbon content, however, structural alteration of these forests caused by forest disturbances adversely affects the carbon cycle. One such structural change happening in these tropical forests is the increasing dominance of lianas (woody climbers). Among various tropical forest types, lianas are an integral constituent of the tropical dry evergreen forests (TDEFs) found in peninsular India. A re-inventory of lianas was carried out to observe temporal changes in basal area and carbon stock in two 1-ha permanent plots of two disturbed tropical dry evergreen forest sites (TDEF; Oorani -OR and Puthupet - PP) over a 19-year interval (2001-2020). The total basal area in OR and PP increased respectively by 2.26 m2 ha-1 and 0.93 m2 ha-1. The total biomass and the carbon stock in OR and PP increased by 82% and 51% respectively. The dominant species Strychnos lenticellata showed an increase in its basal area by three-fold in OR, whereas, in PP, a marginal increase of 4% was observed. The lower diameter class (1-6 cm) showed an increase in basal area in OR and PP by 101% and 16% respectively. The mid-diameter class (6-11 cm) was the top contributor of the total biomass/carbon in both OR and PP in the latest re-inventory (2020). The present results show that lianas, although known to negatively affect the forest biomass/carbon stock, play an important role in carbon sequestration, thus providing insights into their ecological importance which will certainly be useful in proposing strategies for the conservation of this forest type dominated by lianas.
- Research Article
1
- 10.1002/ppp3.10609
- Dec 8, 2024
- PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
Societal Impact StatementForest ecosystems absorb and store about 25% of global carbon dioxide emissions annually and are increasingly shaped by human land use and management. Climate change interacts with land use and forest dynamics to influence observed carbon stocks and the strength of the land carbon sink. We show that climate change effects on modeled forest land carbon stocks are strongest in tropical wildlands that have limited human influence. Global forest carbon stocks and carbon sink strength may decline as climate change and anthropogenic influences intensify, with wildland tropical forests, especially in Amazonia, likely being especially vulnerable.Summary Human effects on ecosystems date back thousands of years, and anthropogenic biomes—anthromes—broadly incorporate the effects of human population density and land use on ecosystems. Forests are integral to the global carbon cycle, containing large biomass carbon stocks, yet their responses to land use and climate change are uncertain but critical to informing climate change mitigation strategies, ecosystem management, and Earth system modeling. Using an anthromes perspective and the site locations from the Global Forest Carbon (ForC) Database, we compare intensively used, cultured, and wildland forest lands in tropical and extratropical regions. We summarize recent past (1900‐present) patterns of land use intensification, and we use a feedback analysis of Earth system models from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 to estimate the sensitivity of forest carbon stocks to CO2 and temperature change for different anthromes among regions. Modeled global forest carbon stock responses are positive for CO2 increase but neutral to negative for temperature increase. Across anthromes (intensively used, cultured, and wildland forest areas), modeled forest carbon stock responses of temperate and boreal forests are less variable than those of tropical forests. Tropical wildland forest areas appear especially sensitive to CO2 and temperature change, with the negative temperature response highlighting the potential vulnerability of the globally significant carbon stock in tropical forests. The net effect of anthropogenic activities—including land‐use intensification and environmental change and their interactions with natural forest dynamics—will shape future forest carbon stock changes. These interactive effects will likely be strongest in tropical wildlands.
- Research Article
82
- 10.1007/s11284-010-0733-z
- Jun 19, 2010
- Ecological Research
There have been few attempts to compare fruit productivity throughout the world, although this is indispensable for understanding the global variations in frugivore diversity. The purposes of this study are (1) to reveal the patterns in fruit fall in tropical and temperate forests, (2) to examine the environmental factors (location, climate, and total litterfall) affecting these patterns, and (3) to assess the effect of fruit fall on frugivore diversity by using bird and primate data. Fruit fall was compared among 53 forests, from around the equator to the cool‐temperate zone at 62°N, in Asia, Africa, North and South America, and Australia. Average ± SD of fruit fall (kg/ha/year) was 454 ± 258 in tropical, and 362 ± 352 in temperate forests. Fruit fall was exceptionally high in Australia (812 ± 461). When Australia was excluded, fruit fall significantly decreased with increasing absolute latitude and altitude, and fruit fall in tropical forest was 1.7 times larger than that in temperate forests (265 ± 227). Total litterfall affected fruit fall significantly, explaining 32, 28, and 64% of the variations of fruit fall in the entire data, tropical data, and temperate data, respectively. The fruit fall/litterfall ratio did not differ between temperate and tropical forests but was significantly higher in Australia than in other regions. Among climatic parameters (annual temperature, precipitation, actual evapotranspiration), a positive relationship was found between temperature and fruit fall in the entire dataset and within temperate forests. Fruit fall seemed to explain the temperate/tropical difference in frugivorous primate diversity to some extent, but not for frugivorous bird diversity. This study shows that the difference in fruit fall in tropical and temperate forests is smaller than that in frugivore diversity, and that it could explain at least part of the frugivore diversity.
- Research Article
4
- 10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100530
- Mar 2, 2024
- Trees, Forests and People
Carbon stocks and sequestration potential of community forests in Bhutan
- Research Article
11
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118299
- Jun 16, 2020
- Forest Ecology and Management
Topmost trees and foremost species underlie tropical forest structure, diversity and biomass through opposing mechanisms
- Research Article
- 10.3390/ani15131914
- Jun 28, 2025
- Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
Ants are key drivers of biodiversity in both tropical and temperate forests, though the underlying mechanisms of this remain debated. In tropical lowland rainforests, ants dominate the canopy as opportunistic predators, shaping arthropod abundance and community structure. By contrast, few arboreal ant species exist in temperate forests due to climatic constraints, and predation pressure is generally low. This changes when ground-nesting Formica species enter the canopy to forage. Using insecticidal knockdown, we collected arthropod communities from trees with high and low ant abundance in both tropical and temperate forests and in different seasons. We found consistently higher arthropod abundances on trees with strong ant dominance, including preferred prey taxa such as Diptera, Psocoptera, and Lepidoptera. In temperate forests, high arthropod densities may be driven by aphid-produced honeydew, whereas in tropical rainforests, the absence of large hemipteran aggregations suggests that other mechanisms are involved. Consequently, this mechanism fails to explain high arthropod abundance in tropical primary forests. In contrast, secondary tropical forests host structurally and compositionally altered ant communities, resulting in reduced predation pressure and a marked increase in the abundance of individual species, including potential pest species. These findings suggest that biodiversity maintenance in the canopy depends on intact, diverse ant communities. Recolonization from nearby primary forests is essential for recovery, yet even after five decades, secondary forests remain ecologically distinct, rendering full restoration to primary forest conditions unlikely within a management-relevant timeframe.
- Research Article
34
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2018.01.029
- Feb 7, 2018
- Forest Ecology and Management
Fates of atmospheric deposited nitrogen in an Asian tropical primary forest
- Research Article
44
- 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143497
- Nov 11, 2020
- Science of The Total Environment
Drivers of carbon stocks in forest edges across Europe
- Research Article
47
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2022.06.002
- Jul 1, 2022
- One Earth
Carbon removals from nature restoration are no substitute for steep emission reductions
- Research Article
317
- 10.1007/bf01007573
- Jul 1, 1999
- Biogeochemistry
Several lines of evidence suggest that nitrogen in most tropical forests is relatively more available than N in most temperate forests, and even that it may function as an excess nutrient in many tropical forests. If this is correct, tropical forests should have more open N cycles than temperate forests, with both inputs and outputs of N large relative to N cycling within systems. Consequent differences in both the magnitude and the pathways of N loss imply that tropical forests should in general be more15N enriched than are most temperate forests. In order to test this hypothesis, we compared the nitrogen stable isotopic composition of tree leaves and soils from a variety of tropical and temperate forests. Foliar δ15N values from tropical forests averaged 6.5‰ higher than from temperate forests. Within the tropics, ecosystems with relatively low N availability (montane forests, forests on sandy soils) were significantly more depleted in15N than other tropical forests. The average δ15N values for tropical forest soils, either for surface or for depth samples, were almost 8‰ higher than temperate forest soils. These results provide another line of evidence that N is relatively abundant in many tropical forest ecosystems.
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.