Abstract

The intelligent task of semantically assigning a paper to a reviewer with respect to his knowledge domain remains a challenging task in academic conferences. From literature, a number of automated reviewer assignment systems have been presented which are based on distributional semantic models such as Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF), Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI) and Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) have been used to capture semantics. Thus, this study presents the comparative study of the three models based on their derived suitability scores between a paper meant for review and a reviewer’s representation papers. From the experimental results obtained, it shows that TF-IDF outperformed the accuracy level of the other two models by a substantial margin.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.