Abstract

We investigate a closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) where the retailer and the third-party recycler compete against each other to collect waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) given that collection effort is their private information. Using the principle-agent theory, we develop a CLSC model with dual collection channel without the government’s reward–penalty mechanism (RPM). An information screening contract is designed for the manufacturer to attain real information on collection effort levels; meanwhile, the optimal decision-making results of other decision variables are derived. Next, we take RPM into account to further examine the efficacy of the government’s guidance mechanism in improving collection rate and profits of CLSC members. Our results indicate that (i) the collection competition reduces the total collection quantity and the expected profits of all the CLSC members without RPM; (ii) all CLSC members’ expected profits are improved if both two collection agents select a high collection effort level without and with RPM; (iii) RPM increases buyback price, collection price, collection quantity, and franchise fee but decreases wholesale price and retail price; with the reward–penalty intensity increasing, the manufacturer’s expected profit first decreases and then increases, while the expected profits of H-type retailer and H-type third-party recycler continue to increase. We find that RPM may ultimately stimulate the collection agents to collect more WEEEs, while the intense collection competition reduces the profits of CLSC members.

Highlights

  • Due to the development of the economy and technology, there are more and more demands for various electronic products that bring people a more convenient life and create a huge amount of electronic waste

  • Wang et al [20] is the first to investigate the effect of reward–penalty mechanism (RPM) on the equilibrium decisions and profitability of the closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) members with information asymmetry

  • The contribution of this paper lies in that we investigate the efficacy of information screening contract and the RPM on a CLSC with competitive dual collection channel and asymmetric information

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to the development of the economy and technology, there are more and more demands for various electronic products that bring people a more convenient life and create a huge amount of electronic waste. Zhang et al [16] investigated the pricing and collection decision problem of a CLSC when the real information on collection efforts is only available to the retailer They indicated that the asymmetric information may mislead the manufacturer into increasing the wholesale price, which can result in a higher sale price and a lower collection rate. Wang et al [20] is the first to investigate the effect of RPM on the equilibrium decisions and profitability of the CLSC members with information asymmetry They found that the RPM can reduce the negative effect of asymmetric information and improve the collection rate and profits of the manufacturers and retailers. The contribution of this paper lies in that we investigate the efficacy of information screening contract and the RPM on a CLSC with competitive dual collection channel and asymmetric information.

Notations and Assumptions
Model Description
Numerical Examples
Numerical Example
Findings
Conclusions and Future Research

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.