Abstract
After the 1982 crisis, Mexico entered into a painful, distressful, and controversial period of state restructuring. Beginning in the 1982, and led by President Miguel de la Madrid (1982-88), Mexico began to withdraw the state from direct involvement in economic affairs adopting economic policies of privatization of state assets and reduction in state provisions for social security. Under the influence of the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), the Mexican State initiated economic modernization and participation in the globalization processes, as a response to the trends of the economic globalization of markets, and the technological revolution that began during the last two decades of the past century. This paper aims to analyze the chronological study of entrepreneuriship and ownership in Mexican governance since 1982
Highlights
Ownership of the Mexican entrepreneurial Under the new economic policies of this structural adjustment reform, one important that changed ownership was the privatization of state-owned enterprises and banks
Mexico ranked second in privatization in Latin America during the decade of the nineties when the government transferred to private corporations assets that amounted to 31,458 million dollars, which represented 20.4 percent of the total sales of state owned enterprises in Latin America
Change of the party in power: The Mexican State of entrepreneurs in the new PAN – presidentialist period In Mexico the XXI century began with the new paradigm of the entrepreneur and manager government
Summary
Ownership of the Mexican entrepreneurial Under the new economic policies of this structural adjustment reform, one important that changed ownership was the privatization of state-owned enterprises and banks. The state-owned firms had been purchased by the larger domestic and foreign business conglomerates. Mexican economic nationalism emerged as a result of promoting public and private Mexican capital to avoid foreign investment, mainly by the United States. In 1982 state owned enterprises produced 14 percent of gross national product (GNP), received net transfers and equal subsidies of 12.7 percent of GNP and represented 38 percent of investment in fixed capital. The crisis of 1982 was meaningful as the crisis of hegemony, which was present in the old alliance between the State and ECC who represented national capital and were the direct beneficiaries of economic policies based on the import substitution model
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
