A Case of AQP4 Antibody–Positive NMOSD Initially Manifesting as Extensive, Asymptomatic Cerebral White Matter Lesions and Subsequently Developing Cognitive Impairment

Should Spinal MRI Be Routinely Performed in Patients With Clinically Isolated Optic Neuritis?

Application of the 2015 neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders diagnostic criteria in a cohort of Chinese patients

Aquaporin 4 antibody‐positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with cholangiocarcinoma: Casual or causal association?

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing inflammatory disease of the CNS, characterized by the presence of serum aquaporin 4 (AQP4) autoantibodies (AQP4-IgGs) and core clinical manifestations such as optic neuritis, myelitis, and brain or brainstem syndromes. Some people exhibit clinical characteristics of NMOSD but test negative for AQP4-IgG, and a subset of these individuals are now recognized to have serum autoantibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-a condition termed MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD). Therefore, the concept of NMOSD is changing, with a disease spectrum emerging that includes AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD, MOGAD and double-seronegative NMOSD. MOGAD shares features with NMOSD, including optic neuritis and myelitis, but has distinct pathophysiology, clinical profiles, neuroimaging findings (including acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and/or cortical encephalitis) and biomarkers. AQP4-IgG-seronegative NMOSD seems to be a heterogeneous condition and requires further study. MOGAD can manifest as either a monophasic or a relapsing disease, whereas NMOSD is usually relapsing. This Review summarizes the history and current concepts of NMOSD and MOGAD, comparing epidemiology, clinical features, neuroimaging, pathology and immunology. In addition, we discuss new monoclonal antibody therapies for AQP4-IgG-seropositive NMOSD that target complement, B cells or IL-6 receptors, which might be applied to MOGAD in the near future.

Short transverse myelitis (STM; <3 vertebral segments) is considered noncharacteristic of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorders (NMOSDs). Nonappreciation of the potential for STM to occur in NMOSD may lead to increased disability from delay in diagnosis and appropriate treatment. To determine the frequency of short lesions at the initial myelitis manifestation of NMOSD and to compare the demographic, clinical, and radiological characteristics of aquaporin-4-IgG (AQP4-IgG) seropositive and seronegative STM. We reviewed the records and images of patients at the Mayo Clinic who were identified as AQP4-IgG positive from 1996 to 2014. Inclusion criteria were first STM episode, magnetic resonance imaging performed 90 days or less from symptom onset, spinal cord T2-hyperintense lesion less than 3 vertebral segments, AQP4-IgG seropositivity, and a final diagnosis of NMO or NMOSD. Patients with an initial longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis were excluded (n = 151). Patients with STM who were seronegative for AQP4-IgG among an Olmsted County population-based cohort of inflammatory demyelinating disorders of the central nervous system were used as a control group. Delay to diagnosis in months, clinical and radiological characteristics, and disability measured by ambulatory status. Twenty-five patients who were AQP4-IgG seropositive with an initial STM represented 14% of initial myelitis episodes among patients with NMOSD. The STM episode was defined as the first manifestation of NMOSD in 10 patients (40%) preceded by optic neuritis in 13 patients (52%) and preceded by a nausea and vomiting episode in 2 patients (8%). In comparison with the excluded patients with NMOSD who had an initial longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis, delay to diagnosis/treatment was greater when initial lesions were short (P = .02). In AQP4-IgG-positive STM cases, subsequent myelitis episodes were longitudinally extensive in 92%. Attributes more common in patients with AQP4-IgG-positive STM than in 27 population-based patients with AQP4-IgG-negative STM included the following: nonwhite race/ethnicity; tonic spasms; coexisting autoimmunity; magnetic resonance imaging (central cord lesions, T1 hypointensity, and a brain inconsistent with multiple sclerosis); and cerebrospinal fluid (oligoclonal bands lacking). Short transverse myelitis is not uncommon in NMOSD and, when it is present, delays diagnosis and treatment. Clinical and radiological characteristics identified in this study may help select patients with STM who are at the highest risk for an NMOSD. Short transverse myelitis does not exclude consideration of AQP4-IgG testing or NMOSD diagnosis.

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an autoimmune astrocytopathy against foot processes of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channels. Patients with NMOSD tend to have other coexisting autoimmune/connective tissue diseases. However, AQP-4-antibody-positive NMOSD coexisting with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is rare. AS is an immune-mediated disorder, a subset of axial spondyloarthropathies, which commonly manifests as chronic inflammatory back pain in young people, and it has a strong association with HLA-B27. In this study, a 35-year-old Indian man with an undiagnosed progressive axial spondyloarthropathy (i.e., AS) is reported presenting with acute-onset longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis, a clinical subset of NMOSD. Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), a primary demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), is an autoimmune astrocytopathy against foot processes of aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channels, which manifests with optic neuritis, longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM), area-postrema syndrome, brainstem syndrome diencephalic syndrome, and cerebral syndrome. Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an immune-mediated disorder, a subset of axial spondyloarthropathies, which commonly manifests as chronic inflammatory back pain in young people, and it has a strong association with HLA-B27. AS characteristically targets the axial skeleton, peripheral joints, entheses (connective tissues between tendons/ligaments and bones), and gut. Patients with NMOSD tend to have other coexisting autoimmune/connective tissue diseases. For example, cases with NMOSD and multiple sclerosis, which are other autoimmune primary demyelinating disorders of the CNS, have been reported. However, concurrent existence of AS and NMOSD in the same patient even over years of disease course is rare. In addition, studies describing neurological manifestations of AS are limited, and they focus on joint inflammation and long-standing bony pathology (ankylosis) related to compressive myelopathy, myelo-radiculopathy, and cauda equina syndromes. The authors present a case of a young Indian man with an undiagnosed progressive AS (misdiagnosed and mismanaged by an indigenous medical practitioner) presenting with acute-onset LETM variant of AQP4-positive NMOSD. A 35-year-old healthy, non-comorbid man from rural India came to the outpatient department with complaints of persistent tingling, numbness, and weakness of both lower limbs (right more than left) for 10 days. The clinical picture showed acute-onset urinary retention, which was relieved by urinary catheterization. An indigenous medical practitioner had prescribed drugs to treat a urinary tract infection. His weakness gradually progressed over the following week, causing him to become bedridden. During the removal of the catheter, he felt urgency, increased frequency of micturition, and overt urinary incontinence. He gave no history suggestive of any girdle-like sensations, root/radicular/tract pain, vertebral pain, trauma, recent vaccination, and diarrheal or febrile illness. For the last 8 months, he had a complaint of an insidious-onset, persistent, bilateral, dull aching pain in the gluteal region accompanied by low-back pain and morning stiffness up to 1 h, which markedly improved with activity and reoccurred following long periods of inactivity. He sometimes had to rise in the middle of the night because of excruciating pain, which could be relieved after moving around the room and corridors for half an hour. He was taking over-the-counter diclofenac tablets for pain relief prescribed by some indigenous medical practitioners who told him that it was due to overwork in agricultural fields, that is, mechanical back pain. He also had a normal X-ray of the lumbosacral spine. He had no addiction liabilities, and none of the family members had ever suffered from a similar kind of illness. He had never consulted any trained medical practitioner, as his previous back-pain-related symptoms responded well to the tablets prescribed by the indigenous medical practitioner(s). During examination, he was found to have recent-onset, asymmetric spastic paraparesis (right more than left) with upper motor neuron-type urinary bladder symptoms. Cognitive assessment (assessed by the Montreal cognitive assessment test) was normal, and posterior column sensations were preserved. Sensory system examination revealed no definite sensory level. Except for the paretic lower limbs, cerebellar functions were normal in other regions. Neuro-ophthalmological examinations were also normal, and no signs of meningeal irritation were observed. The history and course of the disease and clinical examinations were analyzed. Selective tractopathy (early and predominant motor and autonomic tract affection) was suggested for an intramedullary demyelinating pathology affecting the anterior central cord. This case was initially classified as acute-onset non-compressive myelopathy at the lower cervical/upper dorsal region level in a patient with a pre-existing axial spondyloarthropathy. Complete blood cell count; liver, kidney, and thyroid function tests; and plasma glucose and electrolytes were normal, except for an increased erythrocyte sedimentation rate (66 mm in the first hour). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spinal cord revealed a demyelinating LETM from C5 to D4 level (). Meanwhile, an MRI of the sacroiliac joints revealed bilateral sacroiliitis. Brain and orbital MRIs were devoid of any lesions. Anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP-4) antibodies were tested by cell-based assay in serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and both were positive. CSF further revealed lymphocytic pleocytosis and increased intrathecal protein production. Visually evoked potential recordings were also normal. In addition, anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibodies were negative. Anti-nuclear antibody (ANA), ANA-profile, autoimmune vasculitis profile (c-ANCA, p-ANCA), neurovirus panel (i.e., polymerase chain reaction for adenovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, herpes simplex viruses 1 and 2, human herpesviruses 6 and 7, cytomegalovirus, enteroviruses, varicella-zoster virus, Japanese encephalitis, and dengue virus), CSF-polymerase chain reaction for Mycobacterium tuberculosis , angiotensin-converting enzyme, anti-phospholipid, and anti-thyroid antibodies were negative. Anti-CCP-antibody and rheumatoid factor were also negative, including creatine phosphokinase level and serum vitamin B12. Moreover, serologies for hepatitis B, C, human immunodeficiency virus, and scrub typhus were negative. However, HLA-B27 assay was positive. The final diagnosis was AQP4-positive NMOSD associated with AS. He was placed on pulse intravenous methylprednisolone (1 g/day for 5 days). Consequently, his lower limb power improved remarkably. Cyclical rituximab therapy was initiated to prevent relapses. At 3-month follow-up, he had no residual neurological deficit except for persistence of paresthesias. Neuroimaging and visually evoked potential studies revealed no active or new lesions. After 6 months of therapy, a subjective and objective improvement was observed in disease severity based on the Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score. Figure 1. Magnetic resonance imaging of the spinal cord revealed a lesion showing a hyperintense signal on sagittal T2-weighted imaging (A), sagittal short tau inversion recovery sequence (B), and axial T2-weighted imaging (C), indicating a longitudinally extensive demyelinating lesion from the C5 to the D4 level. Our patient satisfied the new Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society diagnostic/classification criteria for AS and the Wingerchuk criteria for NMOSD, an association that has been rarely reported. Amid the extra-articular complications of long-standing AS, neurological manifestations are considered infrequent. However, subclinical neurological complications may be frequent in AS. Common neurological manifestations result from bony (vertebral) ankylosis, subluxation of joints, ossification of anterior and posterior longitudinal ligaments, secondary spinal canal stenosis, bony (vertebral) fractures, and subsequent compressions over nerve radicles/roots/cauda equina, and inflammation-related (entrapment) peripheral neuropathies. Acute transverse myelitis can occur as a subset of several primary demyelinating disorders of the CNS (i.e., multiple sclerosis, NMOSD, myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease, and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis) and various systemic autoimmune connective tissue disorders (i.e., systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease, Sjögren syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and neurosarcoidosis). Acute transverse myelitis (short or long segment) is an infrequent extra-articular complication of AS. It has been reported to evolve either as a distinct neurological complication of AS, or it may develop secondary to TNF-alpha-inhibitor therapy for the treatment of AS. AS is a heritable inflammatory spondyloarthropathy that primarily a

To analyze aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody-positive patients who do not fulfill the current diagnostic criteria of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) and NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD). We used a cell-based assay (CBA) with AQP4-transfected cells to detect AQP4 antibody in 298 consecutive patients with inflammatory CNS disorders seen at Tohoku University Hospital from 2007 to 2012. The patients were diagnosed as NMO, NMOSD, multiple sclerosis, or others using the respective current diagnostic criteria. The seropositive samples by CBA were also tested using a commercial ELISA. Seventy-two patients were AQP4 antibody positive. Among them, 18.1% (13/72) did not meet the NMO or NMOSD criteria (7 with monophasic optic neuritis, 2 with attacks restricted to the brainstem, and 4 with myelitis with less than 3 vertebral segments) and 84.6% (11/13) of these had only a single attack. The ELISA results were negative in 38.4% (5/13) of those patients, and they had lower antibody titers by CBA than patients with NMO/NMOSD. Although these patients had a shorter follow-up and few attacks, they shared some clinical features with NMO/NMOSD patients such as onset age, female predominance, presence of other autoantibodies, severe optic neuritis attacks, centrally located spinal cord lesions, persisting hiccups, and nausea or vomiting episodes. AQP4 antibody-positive patients with single or recurrent attacks of optic neuritis, myelitis, or brain/brainstem disease not fulfilling the current criteria of NMO or NMOSD may not be uncommon, and they should also be included in the NMO spectrum.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) antibodies have been associated with a variety of demyelinating neurologic disorders, including optic neuritis. It remains unclear whether the presence of MOG-IgG represents a distinct syndrome or is simply a marker for central demyelination. Two experts, John J. Chen, MD, PhD, and Clare L. Fraser, MBBS, MMed, debate this topic. Pro: John J. Chen, MD, PhD Opening Statement In medicine, physicians and other providers often adopt the preference of being either a "lumper" or "splitter" when it comes to disease processes with overlapping characteristics. However, once a molecular basis is identified that reliably distinguishes one disease entity from another, particularly in a situation for which such a distinction affects treatment, being a "lumper" could lead to delays in our diagnosis, initiation of best therapies, and understanding of the disease process. The understanding of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a perfect example of how serologic diagnosis has advanced characterization of demyelinating disease. Just over a decade ago, there was debate as to whether neuromyelitis optica (NMO) was a separate entity from multiple sclerosis (MS) (1). However, the discovery of antibodies to aquaporin-4 (AQP4-IgG) in 2004 cemented NMOSD as a separate disorder and revolutionized our understanding of the pathophysiology, clinical characteristics, and treatment of the disease (2,3). More recently, antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) have emerged as a reproducible marker for a subset of patients with optic neuritis and other demyelinating event phenotypes. While there is some clinical overlap with other demyelinating disorders, MOG-IgG–associated demyelinating disease is now becoming recognized as its own disease entity that is distinct from classic MS and AQP4-IgG–positive NMOSD (4,5). Characteristics suggestive of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein disease The most common phenotype of MOG-IgG–positive demyelinating disease is optic neuritis, particularly when recurrent, followed by myelitis, acute disseminating encephalomyelitis (ADEM), and brainstem encephalitis (4–9). There are some characteristics of MOG-IgG–positive demyelinating disease that should alert the clinician to this possibility. Compared to other forms of acute demyelinating optic neuritis, MOG-IgG–positive optic neuritis has a higher likelihood of being recurrent, bilateral, and associated with prominent disc edema. Recurrent optic neuritis is seen in between 50% and 80% of cases of MOG-IgG–positive optic neuritis (6,7,9). This condition can sometimes be steroid responsive and dependent, thus meeting the criteria for what has previously been termed chronic relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (9–11). Bilateral simultaneous involvement occurs in almost 50% of cases of MOG-IgG–positive optic neuritis (6,7,9,12,13). Optic disc edema at onset is present in up to 86% (4,9,12–15). The disc edema can be severe, with peripapillary hemorrhages; these are a feature that is rarely seen in other forms of demyelinating optic neuritis. The vision loss is usually severe at the nadir, but recovery is typically better than that seen with AQP4-IgG–positive optic neuritis (7,9). On MRI, there is often longitudinally extensive enhancement of the optic nerve in those with MOG-IgG–positive optic neuritis (4,9,14,16,17). Perineural enhancement of the optic nerve sheath and peribulbar structures is seen in up to 50% of cases and is a fairly specific sign of this disorder, which is not typically seen with MS or AQP4-IgG–positive optic neuritis (9,15,16,18,19). Patients with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (≥3 contiguous vertebral segments) and negative AQP4-IgG antibody testing should be evaluated for MOG-IgG status; this is the case because such extensive spinal cord involvement is rarely seen in patients with classic MS. Transverse myelitis involves the conus medullaris in MOG-IgG disease more commonly than in other demyelinating diseases (including AQP4-IgG–positive transverse myelitis) (4,7,20). A recent study also found that the T2-signal abnormalities in the spinal cord are often restricted to the grey matter, forming a hallmark "H-sign" on axial images (20). An accompanying brainstem encephalitis and/or an ADEM-like presentation should also raise suspicion for MOG-IgG disease. These phenomena are less commonly seen in patients with AQP4-IgG–positive disease or in those with classic MS. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–positive demyelinating disease is distinct from multiple sclerosis Although antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) were initially associated with MS based on nonspecific solid phase assay results (21), recent studies using transfected cell-based assays have found that MOG antibodies are almost never seen in patients with typical MS. In the process of optimizing the MOG-IgG assay at the Mayo Clinic, 50 patients with classic MS were tested, and none of them were positive for MOG-IgG (22). A follow-up study evaluating 86 patients with MOG-IgG–positive optic neuritis found only 1 patient with MS; this patient had a minimally elevated MOG-IgG binding index of 2.8 (laboratory cutoff of 2.5). In addition, none of the patients in that study had oligoclonal bands in the cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) (9). Many other groups have also found that patients with MOG-IgG–associated demyelinating disease do not have oligoclonal bands in the CSF and do not follow a classic MS disease course (5,7). Finally, a multicenter study of 200 patients and review of the literature found only 1 single borderline-positive MOG-IgG result among 290 patients with MS (23). The lack of coexisting MOG antibodies in patients with classic MS indicates that MOG-IgG disease is a distinct and separate process. Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–positive demyelinating disease is distinct from AQP4-IgG–positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder Patients with antibodies to MOG can develop optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and thus fulfill the criteria for NMOSD, the disease process classically associated with AQP4-IgG. Approximately 30% of patients with NMOSD are seronegative for AQP4-IgG; recent studies have suggested that MOG-IgG is positive in approximately one-third of these patients (5,24,25). Much like MOG antibodies are rare in patients with MS, MOG-IgG is almost never seen in patients who have antibodies to AQP4 (26). This supports the concept that MOG-IgG disease and AQP4-IgG–positive NMOSD are separate entities (5). While there is clinical overlap between MOG-IgG–mediated and AQP4-IgG–mediated disease, the pathophysiologies are very different. Pathologic specimens from patients with AQP4-IgG–positive NMOSD show astrocyte destruction and secondary demyelination (27). In contrast, MOG-IgG–positive inflammatory disease tissue shows primary demyelination with preserved astrocytes; this was previously designated as Pattern II demyelination (5,26,28,29). Therefore, AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG appear to be fundamentally distinct entities with different underlying pathophysiological bases. The importance of testing for myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein and recognizing myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein–positive demyelinating disease as a separate entity Testing for MOG antibodies, and recognizing MOG-IgG–positive demyelinating disease as a separate entity, truly matter because these distinctions influence our diagnostic ability, prognostication, and ultimately, our treatment of the patient. MOG-IgG disease can present with widespread central nervous system (CNS) inflammation that can be concerning for a vasculitic or infectious process. Much of what we know about the pathology for MOG-IgG disease was derived from brain biopsies performed because of diagnostic uncertainty; these were obtained before the advent of reliable cell-based assays for MOG-IgG. Now that we have a better understanding of the phenotype of MOG-IgG disease and have specific assays for MOG antibodies, diagnosing MOG-IgG disease with a simple serum test can lead to the correct diagnosis and exclude the necessity of a brain biopsy. As our understanding of MOG-IgG disease improves, formal diagnostic criteria will be developed and further refined in order to reliably diagnose this disorder. In addition, separating MOG-IgG disease from other demyelinating diseases will improve our understanding of the natural course. This will enhance our abilities to prognosticate and counsel our patients. Presumably because of the differences in pathogenesis, MOG-IgG–associated inflammation has better outcomes than AQP4-IgG disease even among patients who meet the current criteria for NMOSD. Despite a tendency to cause recurrent severe optic neuritis, the majority of patients with MOG-IgG–positive optic neuritis have meaningful recovery of vision and retain functional vision (7,9,30). This is unlike patients with AQP4-IgG–positive optic neuritis, for whom over one-third have poor visual outcomes (31–33). Recognizing MOG-IgG–demyelinating disease not only is helpful in diagnosis and prognosis but also may have a substantial impact on treatment. Recent studies have shown that MS disease-modifying agents are not effective in preventing relapses in the setting of MOG-IgG–associated disease (18,34,35). Treatment with MS disease-modifying agents could lead to the accumulation of CNS lesion burden from continued relapses; this could unwittingly lead to addition or escalation of what are actually ineffective disease-modifying agents, thus subjecting patients to unnecessary side effects. In addition, it is possible that MS disease-modifying agents could even worsen MOG-IgG–associated disease; this phenomenon has been seen in the setting of AQP4-IgG–positive NMOSD (4,5,18,36–38). The optimal treatments for AQP4-IgG and MOG-IgG diseases may be different as well. A recent multicenter study suggested that rituximab reduces relapse rates in MOG-IgG disease but not as effectively as it does for patients AQP4-IgG–positive NMOSD (39). Therefore, in the future, it will be important for patients with demyelinating disease to be classified according to their underlying molecular diagnosis rather than by a set of clinical criteria alone. Appreciating MOG-IgG–associated disease as its own entity will allow us to better understand the disease pathogenesis. This will be important because it will ultimately lead to directed therapies. Such a paradigm is being tested in ongoing clinical trials for AQP4-IgG–positive NMOSD. Lumping MOG-IgG–positive disease with other forms of demyelinating processes will hamper advancements that can be made for this unique entity. Con: Clare L. Fraser, MBBS, MMed, FRANZCO MOG is expressed exclusively in the CNS as a minor component of myelin. The protein structure of MOG is classified as an immunoglobulin and is found preferentially at the extracellular surface; MOG thus serves as a marker of oligodendrocyte maturation (40). MOG is also thought to serve in myelin adhesion, integrity, and cellular interactions (41). It is therefore studied as a target in CNS demyelinating disease. The potential role for MOG-IgG antibodies in AQP4-negative NMOSD was first suggested in 2007 (6). Following this, in vitro and patient cohort studies have pursued this link. Taking this line of thought one step further, it is suggested that MOG-IgG positivity may denote a disease entity in its own right. However, some of the studies have been limited by the assay type used, small patient numbers, limited diversity of the patients reviewed, and the lack of long-term follow-up data. Identification of MOG-IgG antibodies using cell-based assays (transfected or transduced with native human MOG in its conformational state and analyzed by flow cytometry or microscopy) have demonstrated the presence of this antibody in pediatric patients with ADEM or a relapsing demyelinating (MS-like) disease. Further studies using cell-based assays have shown MOG-IgG positivity in patients with NMOSD. Therefore, the data must be reviewed carefully before we decide if MOG antibody–associated optic neuritis is indeed a distinct entity. Consequence, not cause? To place MOG antibodies in the context of the current clinical literature, and thus this debate, it is important to review the animal studies. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) is an animal model of CNS demyelination. Induction of EAE requires immunizing the animal with CNS tissue homogenates or purified myelin components (42). This results in a complex immune response, including a strong T-cell–driven component. Transfer of encephalitogenic T cells can also initiate demyelination and EAE in animals. While MOG antibodies are part of this response, they alone do not necessarily result in the transfer of disease and are not required for severe clinical disease (40,43). This implies that immune system exposure to neurological tissue may result in MOG-IgG as a secondary consequence of preexisting damage; this is similar to the way in which antiretinal antibodies are found in conditions like retinitis pigmentosa. When the mouse IgG monoclonal antibody (mAb) equivalent of anti-MOG, known as 8-18C5 mAb, was transferred into animals that already had EAE, a hyperacute inflammatory response and extensive demyelinating plaques were seen. This suggests that perhaps MOG antibodies amplifies and modifies preexisting demyelinating pathology (44). Furthermore, this effect was dependent on the T cells having weakened the blood–brain barrier; there was no correlation between the antibody titers and the clinical disease (43). In mice, MOG-IgG only causes temporary damage of myelin and axons. More importantly, it does not produce inflammatory cell infiltration, axonal loss, neural degeneration, or astrocyte death (45). It could therefore be argued that perhaps MOG antibodies amplify preexisting disease rather than being a direct and separate pathological entity. The early published clinical research also points toward MOG antibodies being a broader consequence of neurological disease. In 1991, one group reported MOG-IgG in the CSF of 7 patients with MS, in 2 patients with "other inflammatory neurological disease" (OIND), and in 1 patient with tension headaches (46). Larger studies found MOG-IgG in 14%–33% of MS patients, 19%–55% of OIND, and in 3%–8% of noninflammatory neurological disease patients; this included all cases of neurosarcoid tested (47,48). MOG-IgG was also found in 10% of rheumatoid arthritis patients who had no neurological disease (47). Studies from this era are limited by the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), which is less reliable than the newer assays. Even the newer cell-based assays are not without problems. In one study that used full-length human MOG, 48% of epilepsy control patients had a positive test result for MOG-IgG, which reduced to 5.8% when an IgG1-specific secondary antibody was used (49). These results would argue that MOG-IgG is a more generalized marker of inflammation, rather than a disease-causing antibody, in many forms of neurological disease. Chronic inflammatory CNS disease may induce autoantibodies by virtue of epitope spreading. In the MS literature, one study of 103 patients with clinically isolated syndrome found that 21% of patients were positive for both MOG-IgG and myelin basic protein IgM antibodies; 41% were positive for MOG antibodies alone. Those with antibodies to one or both myelin components were more likely to have relapses and to meet the criteria for clinically definite MS (21). The authors went on to emphasize that they could not prove whether the measured antibodies had demyelinating capacity or whether they represented an epiphenomenon of myelin destruction. Postmortem studies also showed higher levels of MOG antibodies within the MS lesions, compared to CSF and serum, suggesting local production as a consequence of disease (50). The authors also reported similar tissue findings in a patient with CNS aspergillosis. While most studies since this time have found MOG-IgG exclusively in patients with optic neuritis and/or myelitis who are AQP4-IgG negative, some concerns have been raised about the data (18). The cohorts included a median of 9 patients with only 24-month median follow-up; long-term follow-up was not available (6). Some cohorts contained no Caucasian patients or were genetically mixed. This may be of relevance as genetic (HLA-DRB-1 types) and infectious (Chlamydia pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori) factors are thought to contribute to the pathogenesis of NMOSD (51). Finally, some control cohorts were too small to assess the specificity of the tests (6). Lumper or splitter? NMOSD is a demyelinating disorder of the CNS, typically presenting with optic neuritis or transverse myelitis (3). Since the discovery of AQP4 antibodies, it is now distinguishable from MS. However, 10%–25% of clinical NMOSD patients are negative for the AQP4 antibody. Therefore, assuming that MOG-IgG seropositivity does not per se constitute an "alternative diagnosis" from MS, then MOG-related conditions could still fit the 2015 diagnostic criteria for NMOSD (3). Jarius et al (18) found that 32% of patients with MOG-IgG met the 2015 NMOSD criteria, while 44% fulfilled the McDonald criteria for MS at the time of their study. However, AQP4-IgG–positive NMOSD is a disease of astrocytes, whereas MOG-IgG targets oligodendrocytes and therefore might be classified as a form of opticospinal MS (52). Perhaps, there are several routes to characterizing the final common pathways of the diseases we know as MS and NMOSD. Indeed, NMOSD may have 3 subtypes: AQP4-IgG–positive, MOG-IgG–positive, and dual positive cases. In a study of 174 patients, 2 cases tested positive to both MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG antibodies (53). These 2 patients were women in their 50s who presented with bilateral simultaneous optic neuritis and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis. Both patients tested positive for MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG in both the serum and CSF. Mader et al (54) found that one-third of MOG-IgG–positive patients who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for NMOSD also were AQP4-IgG positive. Dual serum positivity has also been reported in 1 patient with isolated optic neuritis in Japan and in 1 patient in China (55,56). In another study of recurrent optic neuritis (2 episodes separated by more than 1 month), 6 of 23 patients tested positive for both antibodies (57). Of these 6 patients, 50% failed to respond to high-dose corticosteroids and plasmapheresis, with visual acuity remaining poor. Using fluorescence-activated cell sorting, one group reported 10 patients (8%) with dual positivity to MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG from a group of 125 patients with NMOSD (58). The majority of these patients have MS-like brain lesions on MRI, severe edematous multifocal changes on spine MRI, and pronounced loss of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness on optical coherence tomography, even in clinically unaffected eyes. The disease was typically multiphasic, with a high annual relapse rate and severe residual disability by Expanded Disability Status Scale and visual acuity testing. Yan et al (58) argue that a lack of similar findings in other studies was consequence of laboratory techniques that only allowed for the detection of antibodies in the extracellular or cell-surface domains. To date, I have not found any reports of double-positive antiacetylcholine receptor and muscle-specific kinase antibodies antibodies in myasthenia gravis, yet both forms of the disease are called myasthenia gravis! Why create 2 separate entities for AQP4 antibody and MOG antibody–positive demyelinating disease? Finally, the term MOG-IgG optic neuritis may be a misnomer because 80%–93% of such patients develop a relapsing disease; in addition, 52% develop more widespread neuroinflammatory changes, including myelitis, brainstem encephalitis and cerebellitis (6). Therefore, it seems more appropriate to say MOG-IgG–associated disease (new acronym—MAD?) spectrum disorder rather than MOG-IgG optic neuritis. Rebuttal: John J. Chen, MD, PhD Dr. Fraser has brought up several points that advance discussion of the importance of MOG antibodies in demyelinating disease. Dr. Fraser mentioned that prior studies on MOG-IgG were limited by small patient numbers. However, there are now many recent reports from large cohorts of patients spanning multiple ethnicities, with studies being published in Asia, Australia, the United Kingdom, France, the United States, Brazil, and many other countries (6,7,9,12,13,59,60). These larger studies have provided great insight into MOG-IgG–positive disease and have further shown that this is a distinct entity. I agree with Dr. Fraser that the early studies on MOG-IgG were fraught with difficulties and a lack of specificity; this incorrectly led to the notion that MOG-IgG was associated with MS. However, as Dr. Fraser mentioned, studies in this era were limited by the use of ELISA, which did not evaluate antibodies to MOG in its native form, leading to the poor specificity (61). The new cell-based assays use MOG in its native form which, in conjunction with optimization of the secondary antibodies, have led to very good to MOG are not found in patients, those with classic MS, patients with other optic or in those with other autoimmune disease While there are rare cases of simultaneous MOG and AQP4 antibody positivity in the these are rare with the use of the new cell-based assays and are limited to case In all of the large recent published on MOG-IgG, there have not been any cases of dual positivity for both MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG While Dr. Fraser reported several of patients with MOG-IgG and these studies were and assays that were either not cell based or not with to the secondary There are likely rare cases of positivity because both MOG-IgG and AQP4-IgG demyelinating disease are autoimmune disorders, but this is an rather than the Therefore, autoantibodies to MOG are specific for a unique subset of patients with demyelinating disease and are not seen in other disease In addition, they are not an epiphenomenon of inflammatory CNS or optic nerve disease. It is still unclear whether MOG antibodies are or a marker of disease. A recent study demonstrated that MOG antibodies derived from with MOG-IgG disease were in demyelination on in 2 different EAE et al other potential that are distinct from AQP4-IgG–mediated disease. Even if antibodies to MOG up not being it is that MOG-IgG is a good marker of a specific disease process that is distinct from AQP4-IgG–mediated disease and from MS. This distinction has clinical and be because of the for prognosis and treatment. While some cases of MOG-IgG disease will meet the current criteria for NMOSD or the McDonald criteria for MS, these the lack of specificity in the diagnostic criteria rather than of MOG-IgG disease not being its own entity. There are unique to MOG-IgG disease that it from its MS and AQP4-IgG As MOG-IgG disease has a different presentation and MOG-IgG disease is seen in and unlike MS and AQP4-IgG disease that both have a The CSF for MOG-IgG–positive disease is distinct from that of MS As the pathology found on brain for MOG-IgG is different than what is found in AQP4-IgG disease. The best treatment for MOG-IgG has yet to be but it is that disease-modifying agents used to MS are not Therefore, MOG-IgG–positive disease has a different pathogenesis, and treatment. Lumping MOG-IgG into the disease process will hamper the understanding of this unique demyelinating process. to how distinct from MS over a decade with the discovery of the now that we have a specific and reliable marker for MOG-IgG disease, it will also its own separate disease. I agree with Dr. Fraser that MOG-IgG optic neuritis is not the most appropriate because MOG-IgG–positive disease can have a neuroinflammatory This has been called MOG-IgG encephalomyelitis according to a group of While the will likely its relevance as a distinct disease will Recognizing MOG-IgG disease as its own distinct entity will allow us to better understand the disease process and improve treatments for this disease. Rebuttal: Clare L. Fraser, MBBS, MMed, FRANZCO the the of is toward MOG-IgG optic neuritis being a distinct entity, which Dr. has I that we agree that it does more to a broader to the disease entity, such as MOG-IgG rather the condition to MOG-IgG optic neuritis this is particularly in Some of own in 1 were from the literature, with less for antibody testing than we now have In one of the early showed that patients with MOG antibody–associated demyelination to have a unique and the more clinical has led to and MOG-IgG–positive patients as having a separate disease process to MS and of MOG-IgG–associated demyelination was published The clinical response, and outcomes of patients were The that there remains diversity in associated with MOG-IgG–associated demyelination and that some overlap may be present between patients with clinically definite MS and MOG However, the literature on the clinical and phenotype and of treatment response, I agree with Dr. that this condition as a separate clinical entity from MS and NMOSD. In the that MOG-IgG antibody testing could be restricted to patients with a clinical and phenotype for MS, particularly in the event of isolated or recurrent optic neuritis While MOG-IgG–associated demyelination as an optic neuritis in the majority of patients, there is a clinical spectrum that to be broader than simply patients with NMOSD. the high of MOG-IgG positivity in it seems to test for MOG antibodies in all particularly if relapsing MD, and The to suggests that MOG-IgG–associated demyelinating disease may a distinct disorder with and that it from both MS and NMOSD. one is a or a the clinical spectrum of MOG is still It remains to be seen whether MOG antibodies are a marker for demyelination or whether these are per This may have for treatment and prognosis for MOG-IgG–associated demyelinating disease. Further studies and clinical the several will our understanding of this important

Objective Antibody against aquaporin-4 (AQP4) is a validated specific biomarker for the neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorders. However， the specifity of NMO-IgG/anti-AQP4 has not been systemically tested in CNS infectious diseases. This study was undertaken to investigate whether anti-AQP4 antibody is present in patients with tuberculous meningitis (TBM) and to compare different assays for assessing the seroprevalence of anti-AQP4 antibodies in patients with TBM and NMO spectrum disorders. Methods We set up the conventional NMO-IgG assay， based on indirect immunofluorescent (IIF) reactivity with mouse brain cryosections， and an AQP4-transfected cell-based assay (CBA). IIF we characterized further by dual immunostaining， and the antibody titers were also analyzed. Both assays were used in parallel to test seropositivity of masked serum samples from patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO， 24)， longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM， 22)， multiple sclerosis (MS， 30)， pulmonary tuberculosis (PTB， 30)， tuberculosis meningitis (TBM， 46) and healthy controls (HC， 20). Results Serum NMO-IgG/anti-AQP4 antibody was not exclusively restricted to patients with NMO spectrum disorders. The antibody was detected in the majority of serum samples from TBM patients， and titers of anti-AQP4 IgG in TBM patients were higher than that in those with confirmed NMO and LTEM. Using the IIF assay， seropositivity rates for NMO-IgG were 76.1%(35/46) for TBM patients， 62.5%(15/24) for NMO patients， and 59.1%(13/22) for LETM. Using cell-based assays we found antibodies to AQP4 in 91.3%(42/46) of TBM patients， 91.7%(22/24) for NMO patients， and 86.4%(19/22) for LETM. PTB， MS， and HC all had low rates of anti-AQP4 IgG seropositivity in these assays. Conclusions The data we present suggests that aquaporin-4 autoimmunity may reflect a CNS mycobacteria-initiated immune response. This findings challenge the classic view that NMO-IgG is a disease-specific antibody， and suggests NMO-IgG/anti-AQP4 may be a marker of destructive demyelination.

To compare the sensitivity and specificity of immunofluorescence (IF) and immunoprecipitation (IP) assays using green fluorescent protein-tagged aquaporin-4 (AQP4) in 6335 patients for whom serological evaluation was requested on a service basis. Case-control study. Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory (Rochester, Minnesota) and Departments of Neurology (Rochester, Minnesota; Scottsdale, Arizona; and Jacksonville, Florida). Patients Group 1, 835 Mayo Clinic patients, 100 with a neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorder diagnosis and 735 without NMO spectrum disorder; group 2, 5500 non-Mayo Clinic patients. Main Outcome Measure Sensitivity and specificity of each assay for NMO or NMO spectrum disorder, individually and combined. In group 1, the sensitivity rates for NMO were IF, 58%; IP, 33%; and combined assays, 63%. The sensitivity rates for relapsing longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis were IF, 29%; IP, 6%; and combined assays, 29%. The specificity rates for NMO and relapsing longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis were IF, 99.6%; IP, 99.3%; and combined assays, 99.2%. In group 2, NMO-IgG was detected by IF in 498 of 5500 patients (9.1%) and by IP in 331 patients (6.0%); 76 of the 331 patients seropositive by IP (23%) were negative by IF. Clinical information was available for 124 patients (including 16 of those seropositive by IP only); 123 had a definite NMO spectrum disorder and 1 was at risk for NMO (monophasic optic neuritis). In this large, clinical practice-based study, NMO-IgG detected by IF or IP was highly specific for NMO spectrum disorders. The IP assay was significantly less sensitive than IF. Combined testing improved sensitivity by 5%.

This article provides a practical approach for providers caring for patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorders. Clinical and imaging features, diagnostic criteria, treatment of acute exacerbations, chronic preventive therapy, and symptom management in NMO spectrum disorders are discussed. The rapid pace of research in NMO spectrum disorders has led to many recent advances. A broader understanding of the clinical spectrum of the disease as well as improvements in anti-aquaporin-4 antibody assays have led to recent revision of the diagnostic criteria. Several recent studies have expanded the knowledge base regarding the efficacy and safety of current therapies for NMO spectrum disorders. An NMO spectrum disorder is an inflammatory disorder affecting the central nervous system, previously thought to be closely related to multiple sclerosis but more recently demonstrated to represent a distinct clinical and pathophysiologic entity. As NMO spectrum disorders carry significant morbidity and, at times, mortality, prompt and accurate diagnosis followed by swift initiation of therapy for both treatment of acute exacerbations and prevention of further relapses is critical. This article provides a practical approach to the diagnosis and management of NMO spectrum disorders.

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) has been described as a disease clinically characterised by severe optic neuritis (ON) and transverse myelitis (TM). Other features of NMO include female preponderance, longitudinally extensive spinal...

Background: Although aquaporin-4 (AQP4) is widely expressed in the human brain cortex, lesions are rare in neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Recently, however, several studies have demonstrated occult structural brain atrophy in NMO. Objective: This study aims to investigate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) patterns of gray matter (GM) and white matter (WM) abnormalities in patients with NMOSD and to assess the visual pathway integrity during disease duration correlation of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and pericalcarine cortex thickness. Methods: Twenty-one patients with NMOSD and 34 matched healthy controls underwent both high-field MRI (3T) high-resolution T1-weighted and diffusion-tensor MRI. Voxel-based morphometry, cortical analyses (Freesurfer) and diffusion-tensor imaging (DTI) analyses (TBSS-FSL) were used to investigate brain abnormalities. In addition, RNFL measurement by optic-coherence tomography (OCT) was performed. Results: We demonstrate that NMOSD is associated with GM and WM atrophy, encompassing more frequently the motor, sensory and visual pathways, and that the extent of GM atrophy correlates with disease duration. Furthermore, we demonstrate for the first time a correlation between RNFL and pericalcarine cortical thickness, with cortical atrophy evolving over the course of disease. Conclusions: Our findings indicate a role for retrograde and anterograde neurodegeneration in GM atrophy in NMOSD. However, the presence atrophy encompassing almost all lobes suggests that additional pathomechanisms might also be involved.

Objective To discover the significance of neurofilament light (NFL) chain of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), an axonal injury biomarker, in diagnosis and prognosis prediction of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders(NMOSD). Methods Sixty-one NMOSD patients and 24 other patients such as neurosis, migraine and so on, with lumbar puncture were enrolled as NMOSD group and normal control (NC) group from in and out patients of Department of Neurology of Navy General Hospital from January 2014 to August 2016. The clinical and neuroimaging features of NMOSD group and CSF samples of both groups were collected, and the NFL levels of CSF were measured by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. The CSF NFL levels in different subtypes of NMOSD patients were compared, and the influence factors of the NFL levels in CSF were calculated by multiple linear regression analysis. Results The NFL levels of CSF in NMOSD group (2 729.00(14 862.00) pg/ml) were significantly higher than that in NC group ((299.50(308.00) pg/ml, t=8.588, P=0.000; t test of NFL levels was performed after logarithmicly transforming based on 10). There were no statistically significant differences of CSF NFL levels among optic neuritis, longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and neuromyelitis optica. In NMOSD group, age (b=0.017, P<0.01), Expanded Disability Status Scale score (b=0.078, P<0.05) and enhancement in gadolinium-magnetic resonance imaging (b=0.478, P<0.01) were correlated with the NFL levels of CSF, while gender, courses of diseases and aquaporin 4 antibody in serum were not related to the NFL levels. Conclusion The NFL levels of CSF are conducive to assess the severity and probable progress of NMOSD. Key words: Neuromyelitis optica; Aquaporin 4; Neurofilament proteins; Diagnosis; Prognosis

Patient perspectives on neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: Data from the PatientsLikeMe online community