A Camera Trap Appraisal of Mammal Species Richness and Space-Use Predictors in a Small Reserve, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Mawana Game Reserve (MGR, 110 km2, northern KwaZulu-Natal) is of key importance to the establishment of a regional biodiversity conservation initiative. Quantifying the reserve's medium and large mammal species richness and understanding the predictors of the reserve's richness patterns can greatly contribute to the effective management of this conservation area. Camera trap images of medium and large mammals collected over 40 days in the austral summer from 51 evenly spaced (1.3 × 1.3 km) sites across the reserve yielded 2960 independent detections of 29 medium and large mammal species. Bayesian Multi-Species Occupancy Model (MSOM) estimated 34 (95% HDI: 29–45) species present which correlate well with field observations. Four of nine environmental and anthropogenic variables tested for correlations with mammal richness patterns, using a Bayesian hierarchical MSOM that accounts for imperfect detection, rendered significant results. Species richness increased with improved visibility, reduction in grass biomass and distance to human settlement but decreased with vegetation type variability. The positive association between species richness and distance to human settlement was surprising and one plausible explanation is the possible safety provided by the presence of a biological research field site in the north of the reserve close to settlements. With an estimated species richness of between 32 and 35 species, MGR is an important refuge for mammal species of the Maputaland Pondoland–Albany hotspot and the protection and expansion of this area should be encouraged.
- Research Article
- 10.25972/opus-17254
- Jan 1, 2019
- Online Publication Service of Würzburg University (Würzburg University)
Patterns and drivers of herbivore diversity and invertebrate herbivory along elevational and land use gradients at Mt. Kilimanjaro, Tanzania
- Research Article
13
- 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.01.022
- Feb 13, 2015
- Ecological Indicators
Performance of individual species as indicators for large mammal species richness in Northern Tanzania
- Research Article
52
- 10.1590/s1984-46702010000600012
- Jan 1, 2010
- Zoologia (Curitiba)
The increasing world population and demand for food and other products has accelerated the conversion of natural habitats into agricultural lands, plantations and urban areas. Changes in habitat and landscape characteristics due to land-use change can have a significant effect on species presence, abundance, and distribution. Multi-scale approaches have been used to determine the proper spatial scales at which species and communities are responding to habitat transformation. In this context, we evaluated medium and large mammal species richness and composition in gallery forest (n = 10), grassland (n = 10), and exotic tree plantation (n = 10) in a region where grasslands have been converted into exotic tree plantations. We quantified mammal species richness and composition with camera traps and track surveys. The composition of the mammal community was related with local habitat variables, and landscape variables measured at seven spatial scales. We found 14 mammal species in forest, 11 species in plantation, and 7 mammal species in grassland. Two species are exotics, the wild boar Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758 and the European hare Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778. The most common species are the crab-eating fox Cerdocyon thous Linnaeus, 1766, the nine-banded armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus Linnaeus, 1758 and the gray brocket deer Mazama gouazoubira G. Fischer, 1814 which are generalist species. Our results showed significant differences in mammal species richness and composition among the three habitat types. Plantations can have positive and negative effects on the presence of species restricted to grasslands. Positive effects are reflected in a wider local distribution of some forest species that rarely use grassland. The most important habitat and landscape variables that influenced mammal species richness and composition were vertical structure index, canopy cover, tree species diversity, percentage of grass, and the percentage of forest and grassland at the landscape scale of 0.1 km. We advise the following important measures for conservation of this mammal community: 1) reduce logging and cattle grazing in gallery forest, and 2) increase grassland buffer zones between plantation and forest.
- Supplementary Content
- 10.25903/5be0ec0ec8547
- Jan 1, 2018
Maintaining connectivity for tropical rainforest mammals in agricultural landscapes
- Research Article
51
- 10.1016/j.jnc.2016.02.006
- Mar 7, 2016
- Journal for Nature Conservation
Wildlife species richness and densities in wildlife corridors of Northern Tanzania
- Research Article
3
- 10.3390/biology12020296
- Feb 13, 2023
- Biology
Simple SummaryWeeds have been extensively reported to cause numerous disturbances in ecosystems worldwide. However, the impacts of these weeds on biodiversity, especially for mammals, has received little attention in South Africa. Therefore, this study explored the impact of one specific weed, Lantana camara, on the mammals of an urban Game Reserve in South Africa. Small mammal weights were varied by treatment type and the degree of invasion. Moreover, the weight of these small mammals varied by season across different treatments. This finding implies that the weight of the small mammals in the study was seasonally affected by the quantity of weeds. For large mammals, the distance of treatments (where large mammal tracks were sampled) from a water source was not a significant predictor of species richness, but density of L. camara was a significant predictor of large mammal species richness. This study concludes that the L. camara weed influences mammals of the Groenkloof Nature Reserve (GNR) negatively.Multi-scale approaches have been used to determine scales at which mammal species are responding to habitat destruction due to invasion, but the impacts of weeds on mammals have not been extensively studied, especially in Africa. Inside the Groenkloof Nature Reserve (GNR), we assessed how mammals are affected by an invasive weed Lantana camara. A series of models were applied to determine the differences in species abundance as well as richness, separated for large and small mammals. When diversity indices were used, an Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) revealed no statistically significant difference between treatments (F5 = 0.233, p = 0.945) for large mammals. The results of a Generalised Linear Mixed Model (GLMM) showed that vegetation type (Wald χ22 = 120.156; p < 0.01) and foraging guilds (Wald χ23 = 76.771; p < 0.01) were significant predictors of large mammal species richness. However, for small mammals, the results of a GLMM showed that only treatment type (Wald χ25 = 10.62; p = 0.050) was a significant predictor of the number of small mammals trapped. In addition, the ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences in species diversity between treatments (F5 = 0.934; p < 0.001) and by season (F1 = 9.122 p = 0.003) for small mammals. The presence of L. camara coupled with other predictors was associated with differences in large mammal abundances and diversity, and differences in how these large mammals were distributed across the landscape. Furthermore, the highest species diversity was found in the spring for small mammals. Therefore, for all the mammals studied, the presence of L. camara negatively affected species abundance, richness, and diversity, as well as how these species were distributed across the invaded and cleared areas.
- Research Article
24
- 10.3406/revec.2002.6242
- Jan 1, 2002
- Revue d'Écologie. Supplément
In this study, we present data on species richness of large mammals (mostly with body mass > 1 kg) in two contiguous areas at Saint-Eugène, French Guiana, before and after forest fragmentation by flooding. Assessment realized in 1993-94, i.e. before and during flooding, showed similar species richness and composition in the two studied areas. Before fragmentation, the large mammal community at Saint-Eugène was comparable to that recorded from a site of pristine forest in French Guiana. After forest fragmentation, one of these zones became isolated (medium-sized island) while the second one remained as a continuous forest. As a consequence, the number of species present on that newly isolated patch decreased of 30 % while it seemed non-affected in the continuous forest. This loss in species richness on the fragmented area was confirmed by a survey conducted in 1995-99 at three additional medium-sized islands (>20ha), 22 small-sized islands (1-10 ha) and 11 islets (< 1 ha). Occurrence status of the 32 large mammal species observed at Saint-Eugène is drawn up for all studied sites, and preliminary results on their overall abundance are presented for nine sites. The number of species present in a site was positively correlated to its area, but seemed not to be correlated to its isolation distance from the nearest larger landmass. Islands of less than 10 hectares had a mammal community that was rapidly impoverished and imbalanced in comparison to the one observed on medium-sized islands. The latter presented a mammal community that was richer and more complex, including all trophic guilds, despite it appeared affected in comparison to the continuous forest. Large mammal community on small and medium islands typically included species with small home ranges, and mostly generalist or herbivorous / granivorous feeding habits : armadillos (Dasypus spp.), acouchi (Myoprocta acouchy), agouti (Dasyprocta leporina), kinkajou (Potos flavus), sloths (Choelopus didactylus and Bradypus tridactylus), and squirrels (Sciurus aestuans and Sciurillus pusillus). However, species with larger home range, as felids, tapir (Tapirus terrestris), peccaries (Pécari tajacu and Tayassu pécari) and brocket deers (Mazama spp.) still frequented islands, at least temporarily. We thus discuss the role that fragments may potentially have in connecting larger landmasses.
- Research Article
16
- 10.3897/zoologia.34.e11921
- Apr 3, 2017
- Zoologia
The objectives of this study were to determine the richness of medium and large mammal species in two protected areas of the Espinhaço Mountain Range, state of Minas Gerais, Brazil; and to investigate the factors affecting the occurrence of those species. To accomplish that we placed 49 camera traps activated by heat and motion at Rio Preto State Park (RPSP) and 48 at Sempre Vivas National Park (SVNP). We also collected data on three environmental variables: vegetation physiognomy, elevation and wildfire frequency, to evaluate the influence of these factors on species richness and use intensity (inferred from camera trap detection rate) by large mammals. We recorded 23 large mammal species in the two parks combined. The lowest species richness was found at the rupestrian habitat of RPSP, and in the open grasslands of SVNP. The forest and savannah physiognomies were used more intensively by large mammals. Species richness was higher and use was greater at lower elevations of RPSP. In SVNP, fire frequency did not affect species richness or use intensity. The savannah habitat had very similar richness compared to the forests of the two protected areas. The high species richness and use intensity observed in these forest habitats highlights the importance of riparian environments in the Cerrado biome. The highest species richness and use intensity observed at low elevation follows patterns found in the literature, probably due to variation in the vegetation, which results in greater resource availability. Although rupestrian habitats at high elevations of the Espinhaço Range are known to have a high degree of endemism for some taxa, large mammal richness and use were not high in this habitat. These results indicate that the protection of native vegetation at lower elevations is crucial for the long-term conservation of large mammals in the Espinhaço Range.
- Research Article
4
- 10.1002/ece3.70572
- Nov 1, 2024
- Ecology and evolution
Species richness is an important metric used for undertaking conservation management decisions. However, species richness estimates are influenced by species detection probabilities, with potential to entirely overlook species during surveys. Occupancy models which account for imperfect detection provide unbiased estimates, ensuring accurate estimates of richness. We carried out a camera trap survey in the mountains of north-central Nepal during 2017 and documented a total of 21 mammal species. Here, we used multi-species occupancy models within a Bayesian hierarchical framework to reassess our initial species richness estimate and to understand the influence of environmental covariates on occupancy and species richness of mammals in the area. Our model estimated the mean species richness was ~26 species (95% CRI: 21-36 species), suggesting we might have missed ~5 species during the survey. The mean probability of occupancy and detection of mammal species were estimated to be and 0.02 (95% CRI:0.01-0.03) respectively. Mammalian species richness of the area had an anticipated positive relationship with tree canopy cover though its positive relationship with anthropogenic disturbance was surprising . Mammalian species richness had a quadratic relationship with elevation as is expected. This research contributes to baseline information of the mammal community ecology in north-central Nepal and supports the need for future multi-season surveys to understand the influence of temporal factors on mammalian community and species richness in the area.
- Research Article
42
- 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2017-0483
- Jul 16, 2018
- Biota Neotropica
Abstract: Habitat loss and fragmentation are the main threats to the conservation of Cerrado biodiversity. The objective of this study was to evaluate the implications of habitat loss on the persistence of medium and large mammal species, considering the spatial and temporal changes (years 1985, 2000 and 2014) to the evaluated fragments. The study was carried out in 14 fragments (10.5 - 618 ha), located in Southeastern Goiás, Brazil. Records for 24 mammal species were obtained and revealed the two sites with the largest habitat amount in the landscape contained higher species richness than the remaining sites. The three mammal groups based on body mass (weight < 5 kg; weight between 5 and 20 kg; and weight > 20 kg) analyzed in this study showed different responses regarding landscape changes. For larger mammals (between 5 - 20 kg and > 20 kg), there was significant association between current species richness and the amount of habitat in 2014, while the species richness of smaller mammals did not significantly correlate with any of the variables assessed for any of the years. Therefore, the amount of habitat present within the current landscape was the most important variable regarding mammal species richness, especially for the larger species. The time lag was not evident at the time scale evaluated, and this delay in response may have occurred in a relatively short time (< 15 years). For the remaining fragments in the studied landscapes, most are too small to support populations of some larger mammal species and may also leave individuals more vulnerable to anthropogenic actions (e.g. hunting), whose effects may accelerate local extinctions.
- Research Article
194
- 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2000.tb00605.x
- Jun 1, 2000
- Journal of Zoology
Many hypotheses have been proposed to account for geographic variations in species diversity. In general these relate to some aspect of climate, particularly climatic variables measuring available or potential energy, but while these relate directly to plant diversity they may only indirectly affect mammal species richness. We have examined these relationships by mapping and correlating mammal species richness in southern Africa (n= 285 species) with 15 climatic variables, two topographic variables, and woody plant species richness (n= 1359 species). The effect of area on richness was held a constant by using an equal‐area grid cell matrix superimposed on species range maps, with each grid cell equal to 25 000 km2. We found that variability in the plant species richness alone accounts for 75% of the variability in mammal species richness. Of the climatic variables, only thermal seasonality approaches this figure, accounting for 69% of the variability, while annual measures of temperature, precipitation or energy account for only 14–35% of variability. Differences from North American mammal diversity studies, where annual temperature, and hence annual potential evapotranspiration (PET), have been found to be more important, are attributed in part to southern Africa's climate and vegetation being largely temperate to tropical, as opposed to temperate to polar in North America. By distinguishing different types of mammal based on size, spatial and dietary guilds, other differences emerge. Strong correlations with annual temperature exist only for large mammals, accounting for 60–67% of the variability in species richness of large mammals compared with <20% for small mammals. Small mammals are strongly correlated with other climatic or vegetation parameters, especially plant richness and thermal seasonality; frugivorous and insectivorous mammal richness is correlated with thermal seasonality and minimum monthly PET; and arboreal and aerial species richness is correlated with plant richness, thermal seasonality and minimum monthly PET. Up to 77% of the variability in richness of arboreal, frugivorous and insectivorous species can be explained by woody plant richness, compared with only 38–48% of the variability in terrestrial herbivores. It is clear from this that different kinds of mammals are differentially affected by climatic and environmental factors, and this explains some of the discrepancies found in earlier studies where no distinction was made between different sizes or guilds of mammal. This result has implications both for the conservation of mammalian communities at the present time and for understanding the evolution and structure of mammalian communities in the past.
- Research Article
9
- 10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2018-0671
- Jan 1, 2019
- Biota Neotropica
Abstract: The reduction and fragmentation of remnant vegetation habitats has been one of the main threats to Cerrado biodiversity. The aim of the present study is to make an inventory of medium and large mammal species in a Cerrado remnant and to assess deforestation influence on part of this fragment on the richness and composition of mammal species. The study was conducted in a Cerrado fragment in southeast Goias State, Ipameri County. Data were collected during three different periods (P1, January-June, 2014; P2, December, 2016 - June, 2017; P3, July-December, 2017) through direct (visual, vocal and camera-trap records) and indirect methods (foot prints, animal burrows and other traces) in order to register the mammal species. Jackknife 1 estimator was used to estimate species richness during each of the three sampled periods and for the complete collection period; species similarity between periods was assessed through the Jaccard's Index of Similarity (Cj). Species richness between periods was performed through inference by overlapping confidence intervals (CI). Twenty-nine species were recorded during the assessed period, five of them were listed as endangered in Brazil. There was no significant change in species richness between the assessed periods: species richness of 25 species was observed in Period 1 (P1), the richness of 32 species was estimated (CI = 4.58); 23 species were recorded in Period 2 (P2), and the richness of 30 species was estimated (CI = 4.39), the richness of 23 species was observed in Period 3 (P3) and the richness of 28 species was estimated (CI = 4.70). Similarity in species composition between the assessed periods recorded Cj = 0.71 (71%) between P1 and P2, Cj = 0.66 (66%) between P1 and P3, and Cj = 0.77 between P2 and P3. Fragment deforestation did not influence the richness and composition of medium and large mammal species (within a period of 2~3 years) when the three periods were compared; however, the absence of changes in the community can be the result of time-lag, therefore, we cannot put aside the likelihood of mid and long-term effects.
- Research Article
5
- 10.1111/j.1752-4598.2012.00211.x
- Jul 3, 2012
- Insect Conservation and Diversity
The New World Phanaeini are the best known Neotropical dung beetle tribe and a conservation priority among the Scarabaeinae, an ideal focal taxon for biodiversity research and conservation.We compiled a comprehensive distributional database for 39 phanaeine species in Bolivia and assessed patterns of species richness, body size and endemism in relation to abiotic variables and species richness and body mass of medium to large mammals across nine ecoregions.Pair‐wise linear regressions indicated that phanaeine richness, mean size and endemism are determined by different factors. In all cases mammal body mass had greater explanatory power than abiotic variables or mammal richness. Phanaeine richness was greater in ecoregions with on average smaller mammals and greater mammal richness. Mean phanaeine size increased with mean body mass of the largest herbivorous and omnivorous mammals. Endemism was greater in ecoregions with on average smaller herbivorous and omnivorous mammals. On average, smaller phanaeines had more restricted distributions than larger species; ecoregional endemism and mean body size were negatively correlated.Large phanaeines probably depend on large mammals to provide adequate food resources. Greater richness of smaller mammal species may allow for greater temporal and spatial resource partitioning and therefore greater phanaeine species richness. Low numbers of large mammal species may favour the persistence of geographically restricted phanaeine species by reducing interspecific competition with larger, more geographically widespread and presumably dominant phanaeines.Cerrado, Southwest Amazonia and Yungas are priority ecoregions for phanaeine conservation due to high total and endemic species richness.
- Research Article
53
- 10.1111/geb.13110
- May 7, 2020
- Global Ecology and Biogeography
AimsTaller forest canopies may harbour higher biodiversity by providing more and varied resources. No previous studies have assessed whether forest canopy height shapes the taxonomic and functional diversity of terrestrial vertebrates at global and regional scales. Here, we examine the roles of forest canopy height and other environmental variables in shaping global and regional patterns of species richness and functional diversity of mammals and birds.LocationGlobal.Time periodPresent day.Major taxa studiedTerrestrial mammals and birds.MethodsGlobal forest canopy height data at 1 km spatial resolution were used to measure forest vertical structure. Species richness, functional richness and functional dispersion of mammals and birds were calculated using range maps and trait data. Spatial simultaneous autoregressive error models were used to evaluate associations between species richness and functional diversity and their predictors, including mean canopy height, standard deviation of canopy height, net primary productivity, current climate and historical climate stability, topography and human activities.ResultsMean canopy height emerged as one of two predictors most associated with species richness of mammals and birds as well as mammal functional richness. However, mean canopy height had little explanatory power for functional dispersion. Mean annual temperature and net primary productivity contributed most to explain global‐scale mammal and bird functional dispersion. At the regional scale, mean canopy height, net primary productivity and mean annual temperature were the variables most associated with the species richness and functional diversity of mammals and birds.Main conclusionsForest canopy height is an important predictor of species richness and functional diversity of terrestrial vertebrates at both global and regional scales, at a similar overall level to productivity and temperature. Our study highlights the crucial role of the complex vertical structure in shaping the global and regional patterns of vertebrate diversity.
- Research Article
35
- 10.1007/s10531-019-01821-9
- Jul 27, 2019
- Biodiversity and Conservation
More than 51% of Bhutan is in a protected area (PA) network and our study demonstrates its effectiveness in conserving large and medium mammal species. We conducted camera trapping in Bhutan’s PAs, biological corridors (BCs) and intervening non-protected areas (NPAs) to investigate the richness and diversity of mammals, and assess the network’s efficacy in protecting mammals. 1858 camera traps were deployed within 1129 5-km × 5-km grids over 536 days between 2014 and 2015, resulting in 148,598 trap-nights (mean = 80 traps-nights/camera) which yielded nearly 10 million photos (mean = 5368 photos/camera trap). Fifty-six mammal species (65% of Bhutan’s 86 medium and large terrestrial mammal species) representing 18 families within seven orders were identified, of which, 18 (32.16%) are listed as threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature. There was a significant difference in mammal diversity between PAs, BCs, and NPAs (PERMANOVA test; p < 0.001; Pseudo-F = 6.40; unique perms = 9921), with the strongest difference between PAs and NPAs. Additionally, Hill’s numbers q = 0 (species richness), q = 1 (Shannon’s entropy index) and q = 2 (Simpson’s concentration index) revealed a higher mammal diversity in PAs compared to BCs and NPAs. Higher mammal diversity in PAs can be attributed to the added presence of threatened species, including the tiger Panthera tigris, red panda Ailurus fulgens, Asian elephant Elephas maximus, and golden langur Trachypithecus geei. However, BCs and NPAs share similar patterns of mammal diversity, and globally threatened species such as the Chinese pangolin Manis pentadactyla and Indian pangolin Manis crassicaudata were only detected in NPAs. Although Bhutan’s PA network is effective in conserving much of the country’s mammal diversity, realignment of some protected areas and biological corridors would ensure the long-term protection of several threatened mammal species.