A bibliometric analysis of information system development for environmental sustainability

The study aimed to determine the level of inclusion of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals in the content of social studies and citizenship books for primary stage, where it adopted the analytical descriptive method, and included all (6) books of social studies and citizenship for the primary level.An analysis card was used as an information-gathering tool, which consisted of the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals.One of the most important results of the study was that the total frequency of the UN Sustainable Development Goals in the content of the social studies and citizenship books for the primary level reached (310) times with an average inclusion rate of (33.3%), which reflects a low level of inclusion.The study recommended to direct the attention of curriculum planners to the importance of raising the level of inclusion of the UN Sustainable Development Goals in the content of the social studies and citizenship books for the primary level, and suggested conducting an evaluation study to identify the awareness of teachers of social studies and citizenship in the primary stage of UN Sustainable Development Goals.

This special issue was supported by an Australian National University GrandChallenges grant (Social Cohesion, Diversity and Inclusion) to Israr Qureshi.

Evaluating Urban Water-Energy Systems Based on UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Water, food, and energy are three of the major resource issues facing the world today. To help address these issues, urban wastewater is now being considered as a renewable resource than as a waste- a resource for water, for energy, and fertilizers. It is now well recognized that the traditional urban wastewater infrastructure needs to be re-engineered for improved environmental, social, and economic sustainability by minimizing the energy input for treating the wastewaters and by recovering water, energy, and fertilizers from the wastewater for beneficial reuse. In recent years, several alternate technologies have been proposed to take advantage of the water-energy nexus in urban wastewater infrastructure systems. This paper presents a case study evaluating sustainability of four urban water-energy nexus based on the 17 United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that have been unanimously endorsed by all 193 member countries. A multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approach is used in this study to evaluate the four alternate urban water-energy systems in terms of 30 criteria spanning environmental, social, and economic sustainability. The 30 criteria selected here were derived from the 17 SDGs. The MCDM approach was selected in this study because of its ability to handle quantitative and qualitative criteria and rank the options on a numerical scale. The four wastewater treatment alternatives were evaluated under 12 different scenarios considering high/low priorities of decision-makers towards six different water-energy nexus attributes (pathogen removal, energy consumption, gaseous emission, resource recovery, footprint, and past records).

The essence of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, ratified by all member states of the United Nations in 2015, is encapsulated in the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The present study examines the progress made in achieving UN Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 13 within the context of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS), employing a business and economic perspective. The research methodology employed encompassing a comprehensive review of pertinent literature as well as a meticulous analysis of relevant documentary content. Findings from the study revealed that though businesses in BRICS countries are trying to adopt the United Nations sustainable development goal 13, But there is limited effort in Brazil in the implementation of sustainable development goal 13. In Russia most companies are committed to the implementation of united nations sustainable development goal 13, but this has been constrained by sanction and the war in Ukraine. In addition, Indian companies are fulfilling their corporate social responsibilities viewed through the United Nations sustainable development goal 13. The effort on the part of Chinese companies and the government of China in implementing the United Nations sustainable development goal 13 is commendable as various corporate social responsibility programs and public education have been implemented. In the same vein South African companies have also been seen as very active in the implementation the United Nations sustainable development goal (SDG) 13 by having very important policies built around the goal. Recommendation state that it is imperative that climate change be duly addressed within the overarching vision and objectives of the BRICS businesses as well and there should be a multi-tiered collaboration among BRICS countries to expedite the realisation of the sustainable development goals 13. Equally important harmonisation between governmental bodies, non-governmental organisations, and conscientious corporate entities can be instrumental in attaining superior outcomes regarding the sustainable development goal (SDG) 13. Future studies should include and examine more companies and additional countries in terms of overall plans for achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 13.

We probed what are the sustainability initiatives of the selected Publicly Listed Companies in the Philippines that are advancing the pursuit of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, particularly on Good Health and Well-Being and Quality Education. Specifically, we mapped the sustainability programs implemented by the sample companies that are aligned with the 17 UN SDGs. We also determined if these UN SDGs are embedded and articulated in their corporate vision-mission statements. Then, we identified the explicit programs that were implemented by the selected firms that are advancing the pursuit of a few specific targets of SDG#3 and SDG#4. We anchored our study on the theories of Sustainable Development and Humanistic Management and used qualitative descriptive and exploratory research designs. We utilized purposive sampling to select the 20 Publicly Listed Companies based on four criteria. We employed content analysis to determine their specific programs from their Sustainability Reports and/or Annual Reports. Our numeral mapping analysis revealed that the average number of implemented programs related to the 17 UN SDGs by the sample corporations is 11(65%). Companies are pursuing all 17 SDGs while some implemented only six programs. Our data further showed that overall, 15 out of 20 (75%) corporations have articulated and embedded the essence of the UN SDGs either in their vision or mission or combined vision-mission statements. On SDG#3, our findings disclosed that all (100%) of the 20 sampled corporations implemented definite programs for "ending epidemics and communicable diseases" with specific reference to the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. On SDG#3, our findings divulged that 13 out of the 20 (65%) sampled firms implemented specific programs that directly addressed the target of "achieving health coverage and wellness for all at all ages." On SDG#4, our results indicated that all (100%) of the 20 sample corporations have implemented programs on quality education. Our propositions that there are specific sustainability programs implemented by the selected Publicly Listed Companies that contributed to achieving Health and Well-Being, as well as Quality Education, were confirmed. We recommended including non-publicly listed companies across industries, increasing the sample size, and using of mixed method design in the methodology for a more rigorous investigation of the achievements and impact of SDG target indicators for future research. ReferencesApex Mining Co., Inc (2020). Sustainability Report. http://www.apexmines.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2020-Sustainability-Report-Final.pdfAyala Land (2020). Integrated Report. https://ir.ayalaland.com.ph/wpcontent/uploads/2021/04/ALI-AR-2020-20210420_WEB-1.pdfBenedictus PP. XVI. (2007). Letter of His Holiness Benedict XVI to the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople on the occasion of the seventh symposium of the Religion, Science, and the environment movement. Libreria Editrice Vaticana.BDO Unibank, Inc. (2020). Sustainability Report. https://www.bdo.com.ph/sites/default/files/pdf/BDO-2020-Sustainability-Report.pdfBrundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common guture—call for action. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), 291–294. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44518052Buckley, P. J., Doh, J. P., & Benischke, M. H. (2017). Towards a renaissance in international business research? Big questions, grand challenges, and the future of IB scholarship. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), 1045–1064.Centro Escolar University (2020). Annual Report. http://corporate.ceu.edu.ph/static/media/CEU17A-2020.pdfCreswell, J. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (4th ed.). Sage Publications.Del Monte (2020). Sustainability Report. https://www.delmontephil.com/hubfs/sustainability/sustainability-report/00,%20Del%20Monte%20FY2020%20Sustainability%20Report.pdfDror, E., Kypraios, E., & Forgues, B. (2019). Employing Finance in Pursuit of the Sustainable Development Goals: The Promise and Perils of Catastrophe bonds https://journals.aom.org/doi/abs/10.5465/amd.2018.0137Edralin, D. & Pastrana, R. (2019). Sustainability initiatives and practices of selected top universities in Asia, Europe, and the USA. Bedan Research Journal. 4, April,24-45.Edralin, D. & Pastrana, R. (2020). The Nexus between Sustainable Business Practices and the Quest for Peace. Bedan Research Journal.Elkington, J. (2018, June 25). 25 years ago I coined the phrase “triple bottom line.” Here’s why it’s time to rethink it. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2018/06/25-years-ago-i-coined-the-phrasetriple-bottom-line-heres-why-im-giving- up-on-it.Ercoskun, O. Y. (2005). Sustainable City Plans against Development Plans. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/83293Far Eastern University (2020). Annual Report. https://investors.feu.edu.ph/reports%20new%20format/2021/01072021/ASM2020_FEU_Chairman's%20_AnnualReport2020_Final_Updated(1)%20(1).pdfFraisl, D., Campbell, J., See, L., When, U., Wardlaw, J., Gold., M., Moorthy, I., Arias, R., Piera, J., Oliver, J., Maso, J., Penker, M., and Fritz, E. (2020). Mapping citizen science contributions to the UN sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci 15, 1735–1751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-020-00833-7Freeman, R. E. (1994). The politics of stakeholder theory: Some future directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340George, G., Howard-Grenville, J., Joshi, A., & Tihanyi, L. (2016). Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Academy of Management Journal, 59(6), 1880–1895.Global Compact, United Nations. (2006). What is the Global Compact? https://www.unglobal compact.org/aboutGlobe (2020). Integrated Report. https://www.globe.com.ph/content/dam/globe/brie/About-s/sustainability/documents/GLO_IR2020.pdfHoward-Grenville, J., Davis G. F., Dyllick, T., Miller, C. C., Thau, S., & Tsui, A. S. (2019) Sustainable development for a better world: contributions of leadership, management, and organizations. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(4), 355–366.Johnson, G., Whittington, R., Scholes, K., Angwin, D and Regner, P. (2014). Exploring Strategy, 10th Edition. Pearson Education, Ltd.Jollibee Foods Corp. (2020). SEC Sustainability Report. https://bucketeer-9d45a0bc-28bd-439b-9619-e2bfda478d44.s3.amazonaws.com/public/uploads/ETnPKOuI-FINAL-JFC-2020-SEC-Sustainability-Report-with-Audited-Figures.pdfLBC Express Holdings, Inc. (2020). Annual Report. https://lbcexpressholdings.com/files/2021/09/17/1318/LBCEH_2020_Annual_Report.pdfLu, Y., Nakicenovic, N., Visbeck, M., & Stevance, A. (2015). Five Priorities for the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Nature, 520(7548), 432–433.Megaworld (2020). Annual Report. https://www.megaworldcorp.com/investors/sites/investors/files/2021-06/MEG%202020%20Annual%20Report.pdfMele, D. (2013). Antecedents and current situation of humanistic management. African Journal of Business Ethics, 7(2), 52-61. https://www//doi.org/10.4103/1817-7417.123079]Meralco (2020). Sustainability Report. https://meralcomain.s3.apsoutheast-1.amazonaws.com/2021-07/2020_meralco_sustainability_report_for_web_063021.pdf?nullMetro Retail Stores Group, INC. (2020). Annual Report. https://www.metroretail.com.ph/images/Investor_Relations/Annual_Report/MRSGI_Annual_Report_2020.pdfMorseletto, P. (2020) Restorative and regenerative: Exploring the concepts in the circular economy. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/jiec.12987#:~:text=A%20link%20to%20a%20role,Jawahir%20%26%20Bradley%2C%202016).Pilipinas Shell (2020). Annual and Sustainability Report. https://pilipinas.shell.com.ph/sustainability/pilipinas-shell-annualsustainability-report-2020/_jcr_content/par/toptasks_copy.stream/1621654702710/a864f6dffad9daf8c7585772f2322923d148d6b7/pspc-asr-2020.pdfPhilex (2020). Annual and Sustainability Report. http://www.philexmining.com.ph/wp-content/uploads/2020/Philex%20Mining%202020%20Annual%20Report%20FA.pdfPhilippine Airlines (2020). Sustainability Report. https://phi.com.ph/wpcontent/uploads/bsk-pdf-manager/2021/08/Sustainability-Report-2020.pdfPLDT (2020). Sustainability Report. https://pldt.com/docs/defaultsource/annual-reports/2020/pldt-2020-interactive-sr.pdf?sfvrsn=0Robinson Retail (2020). Annual and Sustainability Report. https://www.robinsonsretailholdings.com.ph/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Salute-to-Frontliners-RRHIs-2020-Annual-and-Sustainability-Report.pdfRousseau, H. E., Berrone, P., & Gelabert, L. (2019). Localizing sustainable development goals: nonprofit density and city sustainability. Academy of Management Discoveries, 5(4), 487– 513.Sachs, J. D., Schmidt-Traub, G., Mazzucato, M., Messner, D., Nakicenovic, N., & Rockström, J. (2019). Six transformations to achieve the sustainable development goals. Nature Sustainability, 2(9), 805–814.San Miguel Corporation (2020). Annual Report. https://www.sanmiguel.com.ph/storage/images/article/file/SMC%20AR%202020_0601Aforweb.pdfSaunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2019). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.SM Investments Corporation (2020). Sustainability Report. https://www.sminvestments.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/SMIC-Integrated-Report-2020.pdfSpreitzer, G. (2007) Giving peace a chance: organizational leadership, empowerment, and peace https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/job.487Sustainable Energy Fund (2021), Regenerative Organizations: Developing an Understanding of How We Work. https://www.thesef.org/regenerative-organizations/#:~:text=Regenerative%20organizations%20use%20or%20develop,work%20in%2C%20and%20Earth%20itselfUN (2016). Report of the Inter-Agency and Expert Group on Sustainable Development Goal Indicators. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/statcom/47th-session/documents/2016-2-iaeg-sdgs-rev1-e.pdfUN (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals Report. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/201

Scaling up urban infrastructure for physical activity in the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond

Although gold mining multinational or transnational companies continue to profit from their activities in resource endowed developing countries, the gap between company profits and social and environmental justice in these resource rich developing countries is a subject of intense debate. This debate is especially heightened when the gap is examined in the context of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This paper employs the Environmental Justice concept to assess the activities of the Goldfields Damang mining company in Ghana vis‐à‐vis the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Drawing on primary data from semi‐structured interviews (n = 22) and secondary sources, the paper finds that the negative impacts of gold mining do not conform with the UN Sustainable Development Goals, especially goals 2, 6, 14 and 15. The study makes two recommendations: First, policies on land tenure and the Mineral and Mining Act need revisions to incorporate more rights for indigenous people; second, existing structures and legislation that spells out compensation and land dispossession practices must be revised thoroughly to align with the UN sustainable development goals. The paper concludes by considering the theoretical and policy implications of the findings for strengthening mining laws and policies in Ghana.

The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) were adopted in 2015 as a universal call to action to end poverty, protect the planet, and ensure all people enjoy peace and prosperity. The built environment plays a significant role in achieving these goals. Recognizing this and embracing the role the UN played in establishing CIB, the theme of this World Building Congress is “sustainable built environment – the role of the construction community in meeting the UN SDGs”. This research evaluated the 2022 World Building Congress proceedings for their connection to the UN SDGs. A literature review, the UN SDG definations, and knowledge of the goals in relationship to the built environment helped to establish working definition for each SDG in relation to the built environment. Each published paper was evaluated for their implicit or explicit connection to each of the 16 UN SDGs. To ensure reliability and validity of the apporach, two independent raters evaluated five papers jointly and then ten papers independtly with results compared. The most frequently cited SDGs was SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure. Two-hundred and twenty of the three-hundred and one 2022 WBC proceedings papers reviewed were judged as being linked to a UN SDG. Eleven WBC Proceeding specifically mentioned UN SDGs. Each paper in the 2025 WBC will self-identify their primary and secondary UN SDG goal. Therefore, this research helps set a historical precedent of how CIB WBC papers have been connected to UN SDGs and establishes a methodology by which previous WBCs could also be analyzed.

This paper considers noise and its control in the context of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable development involves the simultaneous pursuit of economic prosperity, environmental quality, and social equity, and the UN SDGs describe the major development challenges in these pursuits. The SDG Framework comprises 17 broad goals, that cover a wide range of issues including poverty, hunger, health, education, gender equality, clean water, clean energy, sustainable cities and communities, climate, responsible consumption, and production, amongst others. Although noise and its management are not clearly identified in any of the 17 goals, this paper posits that noise is an issue cross-cutting through almost all of the goals. Through the lens of the SDGs, this paper summarizes how a failure to adequately address noise presents a significant challenge to the realization of sustainable development. This paper considers noise and its control, in the context of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Sustainable development involves the simultaneous pursuit of economic prosperity, environmental quality and social equity, and the UN SDGs describe the major development challenges in these pursuits. The SDG Framework comprises of 17 broad goals, that cover a wide range of issues including poverty, hunger, health, education, gender equality, clean water, clean energy, sustainable cities and communities, climate, responsible consumption and production, amongst others. Although noise and its management are not clearly identified in any of the 17 goals, this paper posits that noise is an issue cross-cutting through almost all of the goals. Through the lens of the SDGs, this paper summarizes how a failure to address noise presents a significant challenge to the realization of these goals.

The Sustainable Development Goals present a chance to eliminate poverty and inequality, protect the environment, and ensure that all individuals of world have access to justice, prosperity, and well-being. The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offer a fresh and logical perspective on the various aspects of development.In 2015, the United Nations unveiled its sustainable development agenda, which reflected Member States increasing recognition of the best way to alleviate poverty and improve people's lives worldwide. This research explores the United National Sustainable Development Goals which serves as a tool for the Indian government to collaborate in a coordinated and cohesive way to meet the development requirements of India's impoverished, marginalized and vulnerable populations and to scale up creative development solutions. The first section of the paper discusses the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals created to replace the Millennium Development Goals, which generally apply to all nations, regardless of their level of development, and aim to advance world peace, prosperity, and health. The second section of the paper highlights the Role of India in promoting its efforts to address the interconnectedness of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. The paper also examines India's various challenges in achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). The paper concludes by looking ahead of what are the options before India in its attempt to promote and achieve the goal of Sustainable Development. This research also emphasizes that India is a key player in the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) because of its sizable population, expanding economy, and dedication to tackling problems like poverty, healthcare, and climate change. India receives strategic support from the UN to help it fulfill its goals of eradicating poverty and inequality and achieving sustainable development in compliance with the SDGs, which have been agreed upon worldwide. The study accentuates that there are still many obstacles to overcome, such as poverty, inequality, and environmental degradation, to accomplish the SDGs fully.

PurposeThe study aims to analyse the race towards green development and United Nations sustainable development goals (SDGs) in the cases of Huawei and Shell. Both companies are the leaders in their respective industries. Huawei is an example case study representing the information and communications technology (ICT) industry whereas Shell is an example case study representing the oil and gas industry. The research analyses of the races in achieving UN SDGs were undertaken based on the innovation diffusion framework with the use of machine learning algorithms trained to extract data on sustainability activities and initiatives.Design/methodology/approachThe research analyses the two case studies of Huawei and Shell. The research was undertaken through the steps of training machine learning algorithms, industry benchmarking and evaluating the performance of the race. The analyses regarding the activities and initiatives of Huawei and Shell in contributing towards SDGs are based on the data in the past 10 years (Years 2010–2019) using machine learning to extract data on sustainability activities and initiatives. In the case of Huawei, 313 sustainability reports were fed to the unsupervised machine learning algorithms revealing 15,101 sustainability actions and initiatives related to UN SDGs in the ICT industry. In the case of Shell, 2,015 sustainability reports were fed to the unsupervised machine learning algorithms revealing 47,365 sustainability actions and initiatives related to UN SDGs in the oil and gas industry.FindingsThe analyses of findings revealed that Huawei and Shell performed very well in progressing towards the UN SDGs. Huawei had strong performance in the ICT industry with regard to SDGs No. 3, 4, 7, 8, 11, 12 and 16 while Shell had strong performance in the oil and gas industry with regard to SDGs No. 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 12 and 16. Both companies had placed a focus on achieving SDG 12 responsible consumption and production, SDG 7 affordable and clean energy and SDG 4 quality education. The synthesised business model innovations of Huawei and Shell had shown their environmental, social and governance strategies – Huawei’s 2030 vision for green development and Shell’s 2050 vision for net zero emissions.Practical implicationsThe five pillars of people, planet, prosperity, peace and partnership according to the UN 2030 agenda for sustainable development have shown the way a company operates to promote sustainable eco-systems. The extent to which both Huawei and Shell link corporate strategies to the UN SDGs has reflected their implementation progress. Furthermore, the business model innovations of Huawei and Shell provides a useful framework which can be applied to encourage other companies/organisations in various industries to undertake ESG activities in practice.Originality/valueThe main contribution of this research is the application of machine learning algorithms and the innovation diffusion model in analysing the SDGs performance. The study applies the innovation diffusion framework to explore strategic actions and initiatives of Huawei and Shell in transitioning towards sustainability. The use of machine learning algorithms has identified their sustainability approach in achieving the UN SDGs.

This paper aims to develop an integrated understanding of how meditation can enhance employee well-being, particularly in the context of achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal No. 8 of decent work. This paper aims to develop an integrated understanding of how meditation can enhance employee well-being, particularly in the context of achieving the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal No. 8 of decent work. The research findings generate an integrated conceptual model illustrating how meditation reduces stress and positively impacts performance, relationships, and well-being in the workplace. The study highlights the relevance of meditation for promoting safe and healthy working environments. This study is among the first to link the practice of meditation directly to the realization of the UN Sustainable Development Goals, specifically focusing on decent work. The implications for incorporating meditation into educational curricula and workplace policies are also discussed.

Power dynamics in organisations and the role of information systems

The activities of a higher education institution in the context of achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals are one of the important factors in ensuring economic, social and environmental security. Being educational and research centres of local communities, universities have an important impact on their residents, and with active educational activities and cooperation, this impact increases significantly. Another extremely important factor in this growth is teaching, research, educational and advisory activities and cooperation at the regional, national and international levels. The main purpose of this article is to describe the sustainable activities of a higher education institution to achieve the UN Sustainable Development Goals in the context of environmental, economic and social components in accordance with the standards assessed by international rankings of higher education institutions for sustainable development. Attention is focused on the international rankings of Times Higher Education University Impact Rankings. Additionally, the scheme of correlations between the UN Sustainable Development Goals and the basic spheres of global society and the differences between the interrelated concepts of “sustainable development” and “sustainability” are investigated. Sustainability is a harmonious combination of economic development, high social standards and a clean environment, reflecting the long-term goal of social relations, while according to UNESCO, sustainable development refers to the processes and ways of achieving it. In addition, sustainable development is mostly used as a legal term in the international regulatory framework. With regard to the basic components of sustainability (economy, environment and society), when studying their correlation with the UN Sustainable Development Goals, we can agree with the conclusion of a number of scholars that the economic component still prevails in the structure of the content of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. To a certain extent, this phenomenon is controversial, as the economy has a negative impact on the environment through industrial development. At the same time, in the absence of economic resources, it is impossible to invest in environmental restoration and environmentally sustainable management methods and means.

Sustainable development, logistics, and supply chain are being combined into three increasingly connected and topical global research areas. Therefore, this paper’s novelty identifies and defines the priorities of the UN Sustainable Development Goals and sustainable development dimensions in supply-chain- and logistics-management-related studies in the last decade. Knowing logistics and supply chain sustainability focus and orientation is valuable information for researchers and managers to adapt and mitigate their business logistics according to the forecasted trends. The paper provides a systematic and comprehensive review of the literature and is based on 116 scientific papers published between 2010 and 2020 in 73 international journals in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The study defines focus with integrating environmental, social, and economic sustainability for logistics- and supply-chain-related studies. It emphasizes primary and secondary links of investigated studies with 17 United Nations sustainable development goals. The bibliometric analysis also examined keyword relations. One of the main contributions is that economic sustainability was identified as the most represented one-dimensional sustainability focus. It was revealed that supply chain studies integrated all three sustainability dimensions more frequently (50.60%) than logistics studies, which were equally related to studying two- or three-dimensions of sustainability (39.39%). The most significant findings are also that studies were identified to be oriented primarily towards “responsible consumption and production”, “industry, innovation, and infrastructure” and “affordable and clean energy” and secondary especially on “sustainable cities and communities”.