Abstract
Both the treatment and post exposure prophylaxis (PEP) of rhus induced acute contact dermatitis (ACD) are suboptimal. Previous studies have indicated that the commercial available mixture of alcohol solubles and anionic surfactants (Zanfel) is effective in treating ACD but efficacy has not been established through objective evaluation of photographs of the ACD rash. The purpose of this study was to determine if objective observers can determine whether subjects with experimentally induced ACD received Zanfel or placebo for either treatment or post exposure prophylaxis.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
