Abstract
This chapter focuses on the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda (ICTR) concerning hate speech based on ethnicity has contributed significantly to the situation in which this genocide could happen in Rwanda in 1994 and its implications for national legislation. It also focuses on the difficult balance to be struck between the fundamental human right of freedom of expression versus its limitations required by the need to protect the human rights (sometimes involving life and health) of others. The fatal role of the radio and the newspapers in the Rwandan genocide has been clearly established by the ICTR jurisprudence. The role of the ICTR jurisprudence should provide guidance for the national legislator and thereby be a deterrent to all those who aim at inciting racial hatred. Keywords: human rights; ICTR jurisprudence; national legislation; Rwanda genocide
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
International Criminal Tribunal For Rwanda
Human Right Of Freedom
Human Rights
Right Of Freedom
Fundamental Human Right
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedSimilar Papers
Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Jul 28, 2003
Moscow Journal of International Law
Dec 26, 2020
Social Science Research Network
Jun 12, 2020
The International Journal of Human Rights
Mar 16, 2021
Pretoria Student Law Review (2009) 3
Jan 1, 2009
Dec 30, 2016
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Mar 1, 2010
Jan 1, 2010
Jan 1, 2007
European Journal of International Law
Aug 1, 2020
Journal of Eastern African Studies
Apr 3, 2017
Journal of International Criminal Justice
Aug 12, 2005
Philosophy Today
Jan 1, 2015
Jan 1, 2004
Jul 31, 2009