Abstract

Abstract Aim A group and hold (G&H) forms part of the pretransfusion compatibility testing and is commonly requested in anticipation of a possible blood transfusion. Requests made in the context of elective procedures with a low transfusion probability, such as a mastectomy, are associated with added financial burden and increases workload in a healthcare system. This audit aims to analyse the cost-benefit associated with the routine request for a preoperative G&H in patients undergoing mastectomies. Method A total of 100 patients undergoing mastectomies from the period of September 2019 to October 2020 were included in the audit. Data regarding blood order requests, units of blood transfused, perioperative haemoglobin and the type of mastectomy (right, left or bilateral) were collected. Results All patients had a routine G&H as part of their preoperative assessment. The average age in this cohort was 60.3. Right-sided mastectomy was the commonest procedure in this cohort (N = 52). The average preoperative haemoglobin was 13.0g/dL. 2/100 patients received post-operative blood transfusions. The transfusion probability in this cohort was 2%. Only 15% of the cohort had a post-operative haemoglobin level checked. The average drop in haemoglobin in this cohort was 2.3g/dL. Conclusions This audit demonstrates the low prevalence of blood transfusions in patients undergoing mastectomies, consistent with current literature. The projected cost savings associated with selective requests for G&H are significant. However, the implementation of a safe and targeted blood ordering approach in patients with high bleeding risks will require a validated stratification system.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.