Translate 
Abstract
Hand immobilization remains the primary approach in the management of fractures, soft tissue injuries and post-surgical rehabilitation. However, prolonged immobilization can negatively impact the rehabilitation process, often leading to muscle atrophy, joint stiffness, and functional impairments. Advances in 3D-printed orthoses offer a promising alternative to plaster casts, providing superior support, greater comfort, and improved clinical outcomes. Through this study, we aim to evaluate the benefits of 3D-printed orthoses on clinical outcomes of patients, compared to the traditional plaster cast method. A total of 54 consecutive patients who sought emergency care for hand injuries were included in the study. Hand functionality (MHQ score), grip strength, hand and forearm circumference, pain levels, total range of motion of the hand, and patient satisfaction (QUEST 2.0 score) were evaluated at baseline, post-immobilization, and after a one-month follow-up. Patients using 3D-printed orthoses reported superior grip strength, improved range of motion, lower pain levels and overall higher satisfaction compared to those immobilized with traditional plaster casts. Our findings support the use of 3D-printed orthoses as a more effective and patient-friendly alternative to traditional plaster cast immobilization, demonstrating better clinical outcomes and enhanced hand rehabilitation. These findings have the potential to reshape clinical practice by replacing conventional casting methods with more adaptable, efficient and patient-specific immobilization orthoses.
Published Version
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
