Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy of an 80 mL double-balloon catheter versus a 30 mL single-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening.Methods: We performed a randomized controlled trial of women ≥18 years with a singleton, vertex pregnancy, a reactive non-stress test, and a Bishop score ≤5 comparing an 80 mL double- versus a 30 mL single-balloon catheters for cervical ripening. Women were randomly assigned to the two catheter types, stratified 1:1 by nulliparity or multiparity. The primary outcome was achieving a Bishop score ≥6 at the time of catheter expulsion or removal assessed by chi-squared, stratified by parity.Results: A total of 98 women were included in the analysis (50 in the 80 mL double and 48 in the 30 mL single-balloon catheter groups). Among nulliparous women, a greater proportion of those randomized to the 80 mL double achieved a Bishop score ≥6 at time of catheter removal (88.0% versus 28.0%; p ≤ 0.001) and delivered vaginally (60.0% versus 32.0%; p = 0.047) compared to those with the 30 mL single-balloon catheter. We found no difference by catheter type in achieving a Bishop score ≥6 or vaginal delivery among multiparous women.Conclusions: These findings suggest the 80 mL double-balloon catheter is more effective than the 30 mL single-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening and achieving a vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.