Abstract

Both John Milton’s Paradise Lost and Philip Pullman’s retelling of the story, His Dark Materials, use scent imagery in descriptions of morally significant characters. But what is the significance of the consistent scent imagery? Hans J. Rindisbacher’s theory in The Smell of Books: A Cultural-Historical Study of Olfactory Perception in Literature (1992) states that scent imagery, in literature pertaining to Christian symbolism, indicates a dichotomy of morality. This theory is modified to illustrate that scent is used to signify a character’s condition of knowledge. The presence of good scent in Paradise Lost indicates that a character possesses pure knowledge of good and evil, the presence of bad scent indicates a character’s corrupt condition of knowledge of good and evil. Alternatively, the presence of good scent in His Dark Materials signifies that a character possesses pure self-knowledge, whereas the presence of bad scent indicates the corruption of a character’s self-knowledge. Furthermore, the attribution of neutral scent or lack of scent imagery to morally significant characters, such as Satan and Mrs. Coulter, signifies the morally ambiguous actions which make these characters difficult to define as virtuous or evil. The analysis of the scent imagery in Paradise Lost and His Dark Materials demonstrates the significance of scent theory in the research and analysis of literature, as a possible method of evaluating a character’s moral status.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.