Abstract

Aims: There are limited data regarding the effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) on the risks of appropriate and inappropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy. The present study was designed to compare the risk of appropriate and inappropriate ICD therapy in patients with or without DM. Methods and Results: The risk of a first appropriate ICD therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (including anti tachycardia pacing [ATP] and shock) was compared between 764 DM and 1346 non-DM patients enrolled in the national Israeli ICD registry. We also compared the risks of inappropriate ICD therapy, and death or cardiac hospitalization between diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Diabetic patients were older, were more likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy, lower ejection fraction, atrial fibrillation, and other co-morbidities. The 3-year cumulative incidence of appropriate ICD therapy was similar in the DM and non-DM groups (Figure). Multivariate analysis showed that DMdid not affect the risk of appropriate ICD therapy (HR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.78–1.47, p = 0.694) or inappropriate therapy (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.42–1.23, p = 0.232). However, DM was associated with a 31% increased risk for death or cardiac hospitalization (p= 0.005). Results were similarin subgroup analyses including ICD and CRT-D recipients, primary or secondary prevention indication for an ICD. Conclusions: Despite a significant excess of cardiac hospitalizations and mortality in the diabetic population, there was no difference in the rate of ICD treatments, suggesting that the outcome difference is non-arrhythmic.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.