1489. Safety and Performance of a Pharmacist-Driven Nasal MRSA PCR Protocol for De-escalation of Empiric Vancomycin for Suspected Pneumonia at an Academic Medical Center

Abstract

BackgroundLimited published data supports the de-escalation of empiric anti-methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotics for suspected pneumonia upon negative nasal MRSA screening. Besides limited sample sizes, special populations, such as those who are immunocompromised and/or critically ill, have been underrepresented in these reports. We describe real-world efficacy and safety of a pharmacist-driven nasal MRSA PCR testing protocol implemented at Stanford Health Care in May 2018 across a diverse patient population.MethodsThis was an observational cohort study of adult patients who received vancomycin for empiric pneumonia before (PRE) vs after (POST) implementation of a pharmacist-driven nasal MRSA PCR testing protocol (between 05/01/2017 - 08/31/2017 (PRE) and 5/7/2018 - 12/31/2019 (POST). The primary outcome measure was duration of vancomycin administration. Secondary outcomes included time to vancomycin discontinuation, frequency of restarting vancomycin for empiric pneumonia within 7 days, acute kidney injury (defined as “risk” by RIFLE criteria), and MRSA respiratory cultures. Statistical methods are described in Figure A.Figure A. Statistical methods ResultsTotal of 610 patients were included in this study with 116 in the PRE group and 494 in the POST group. Over 40% were critically ill and approximately 37% were immunocompromised in both groups (Table 1). For the primary outcome, median vancomycin duration was significantly shorter in the POST group (1.29 days; 95% CI 1.13-1.45) vs. PRE group (1.98 days; 95% CI 1.49-2.46) (p < 0.0005), a 34.8% reduction (Figure 1). Median vancomycin duration was lower in patients with a negative vs positive nasal MRSA PCR (1.20 days [95% CI 1.08-1.33] vs 2.53 days [95% CI 1.77-3.29], p < 0.0005), a 52.6% reduction (Figure 2). MRSA was recovered in respiratory cultures in 1.7% vs 1.4% in the PRE vs POST groups. One (0.002%) patient had a negative nasal MRSA PCR but culture-confirmed MRSA pneumonia and recovered after completing a treatment course. Secondary safety outcomes were similar between groups (Table 2).Tables 1 and 2: Baseline Characteristics and Secondary Outcomes Figure 1. Primary Outcome: Kaplan–Meier Estimates of Cumulative Active Vancomycin Therapy Before and After Implementation of Nasal MRSA PCR protocol Figure 2. Secondary Outcome: Figure 2. Kaplan–Meier Estimates of Cumulative Active Vancomycin Therapy in Patients with Negative vs Positive Nasal MRSA PCR ConclusionPharmacist-driven nasal MRSA PCR testing is effective and safe in early de-escalation of empiric vancomycin used for pneumonia treatment in a diverse population including critically ill and immunocompromised patients.Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures