Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose Symptom changes are usually reported using summary statistics such as mean and/or median. The main objective of this retrospective study was to determine the magnitude of symptom changes as assessed by the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) after outpatient palliative care (OPC) at the first follow-up visit. Methods We reviewed 1612 consecutive patients who were referred to the outpatient Supportive Care Center and who completed the ESAS at initial and first follow-up visits between January 2003 and December 2010. All patients received interdisciplinary care led by palliative care specialists following an institutional protocol. Results The distribution of the magnitude of symptom changes was stratified by baseline intensities. Patterns were similar for different ESAS items. At the follow-up visit, 52% to 74% of patients achieved symptom improvement by >= 1 point. However, 48% to 80% of patients with moderate/severe intensity at baseline complained of symptoms with ESAS score >= 4 after OPC. Symptoms with absent/mild intensity worsened ranging from mean of -3.04 to 0.12 at the first follow-up visit, whereas symptoms with moderate/severe intensity improved from -0.2 to 3.86(p Conclusion Considerable patients with moderate or severe intensity at the baseline still had symptoms with ESAS score >= 4. Patients with absent/mild intensities at baseline complained of symptom exacerbation at the first follow-up visit. Various strategies are needed to optimize symptom control in advanced cancer. Disclosure All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.