목적: 한국안광학회지에 게재된 논문을 대상으로 안경광학의 연구동향을 분석하여 향후 연구를 위한 기초자료로 활용하고자 하였다. 방법: 창간호부터 2014년까지 한국안광학회지에 게재된 990편의 논문을 대상으로 일반적 특성과 연구자 특성, 연구 특성, 연구동향을 통계분석 하였다. 결과: 게재논문의 저자 수는 2인과 3인이 각각 26.8%로 가장 많았다. 주 저자 소속지역은 전라지역이 31.3%로 가장 많았고 소속대학의 학제는 4년제가 43.0%로 가장 많았다. 연구방법은 검사가 40.9%로 가장 많았으며 연구주제는 검안학분야가 29.8%로 가장 많았다. 저자 수에 따라 주저자 소속대학의 학제, 연구방법에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다(p=0.000). 주 저자 소속대학의 학제에 따라 연구방법에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다(p=0.000). 연구주제에 따라 주 저자 소속대학 학제, 연구방법(p=0.000)에서 유의한 차이가 나타났다. 기간구분(1996~2004, 2005~2014)에 따라 유의한 차이가 나타났는데 저자 수는 증가하였으며, 4년제 대학교 소속 저자가 많아졌다(p=0.000). 검안학과 콘택트렌즈분야의 논문이 증가하였고 연구비수혜도 증가하였다(p<0.005). 또한 서울, 충청지역의 주 저자가 증가하였다(p=0.000). 결론: 안경광학 학문의 발전을 위해서 연구자의 층을 넓히고 다양한 연구주제를 다루어야 하며 안경업계와 학계의 공동노력, 해외협력이 필요하다. Purpose: This study aimed to analyze the research trends of Ophthalmic Optic by targeting the papers published in the Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society and serve it as a basis for future researches. Methods: This study was conducted through a statistical analysis of the general characteristics, researcher characteristics, research characteristics and the research trends from total 990 papers, from the first issue to the last issue in 2014, published in the Journal of Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society. Results: Most common number of the authors of the published papers were two or three, respectively 26.8%. Most of the lead authors belong to the schools in Jeolla-do province (31.3%). Most of the educational system of which lead authors belong to is four-year-course system (43.0%). Most common research methods were optometric tests (40.9%). The most common subjects of researches are about the field of optometry (29.8%). The study shows that there were significant differences in the research methods depending on the school systems of the universities to which the lead authors belong (p=0.000). There also were significant differences in the school systems of the universities to which the lead authors belong, and research methods depending on the research subjects (p=0.000). There were meaningful differences according to the period divisions (1996 to 2004 and 2005 to 2014), i.e. the number of authors has been growing, and it is the same case for the number of the authors who belong to four-year-course universities (p=0.000). The number of papers on optometry and contact lenses have increase. The benefits of the research funds have also increased (p<0.005). In addition, the number of the lead authors in the Seoul and Chungcheong province have increased (p=0.000). Conclusions: For the development of the Ophthalmic Optics, it is necessary to broaden the stratum of researchers and deal with various research topics, And joint efforts between eyewear industry and academia and international cooperations are needed.

Full Text

Published Version
Open DOI Link

Get access to 115M+ research papers

Discover from 40M+ Open access, 2M+ Pre-prints, 9.5M Topics and 32K+ Journals.

Sign Up Now! It's FREE

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call