Культура і людина в онтології становлення

Abstract

The formation of nonlinear science activated the paradigm changes in all fields of knowledge. In the context of ontology of becoming the essence of culture and its role in human life needs to rethink. Comprehension of the culture a priori is impossible out of problem of human essence and existence, just as a human being out of culture. There is a need of creating of anthropocultural ontology, which represents the specific deployment of human in cultural and cultural in human. Anthropocultural ontology of becoming is communicative ontology, because it reflects the interaction of human and culture, reveals the dynamism, procedural of anthropocultural being. It is based on existential ontology of culture, represents the essential interdependence of culture and human existence. In its analysis can be used methodological approaches of postnonclassical sciences: culture and human can be interpret as anthropocultural integrity, which is created on the principle of recursion – a whole forms its parts and at the same time created them. In anthropocultural integrity arises a culture-dimensional person who creates a culture by self-organization. For centuries, philosophical and anthropological thought identified the culture of first-entity person. The interpretation of culture conforms to the mono-essential understanding of human. The situation becomes fundamental changes with the appearance of non-classical anthropological concepts that reveal the ambivalence of values of culture. Summing up the achievements of philosophical and anthropological thought, V.G. Tabachkovsky proposed the concept of poly-essence, which indicates the mutual transitions of the essence and existence of human, his existential openness and inexhaustibility, the fundamental incompleteness, redundancy and values ambivalence of his essential manifestations. Poly-essential human can be defined as a fundamentally unstable creature, capable of nonlinear self-realization, in which released his excessive destructive and self-organizing (creative) potential. Poly-essential human has become a center of communicative anthropocultural ontology. Unstable human is capable of formation if he is able to counteract the destructive manifestations of his own, is capable of self-organization. In this context, appears the existential ontological need for human-keeping mode of life, which human has to create by own efforts. In ontology of becoming his search is represented by culture as a mode of self-organization of human life. In the analysis of anthropocultural being the problem of interaction between human and the culture gives way to the problem of theirs mutual creating and mutual support. In the culture restrain mechanisms of decay of human existence arise, kept and constantly are renovated. Creative human-dimension of culture is revealed in the situation of existential constancy and sustainability (in everyday and marginal life).