Abstract
LANGUAGE NOTE | Document text in Chinese; abstract in English only.Professor Fang argues that we should clearly distinguish rights and goods to deal with the issue of same-sex marriage. In my opinion, rights are like names, whereas goods are like reality. Fang’s view sounds like a middle-way position. However, a decision on whether Chinese homosexuals should obtain the name of marriage should also consider China’s actual social reality, without simply copying modern Western theories.DOWNLOAD HISTORY | This article has been downloaded 99 times in Digital Commons before migrating into this platform.
Highlights
Professor Fang argues that we should clearly distinguish rights and goods to deal with the issue of same-sex marriage
Rights are like names, whereas goods are like reality
A decision on whether Chinese homosexuals should obtain the name of marriage should consider China’s actual social reality, without copying modern Western theories
Summary
The Issue of Legalizing Same-sex Marriage in China: Between Name and Reality Professor Fang argues that we should clearly distinguish rights and goods to deal with the issue of same-sex marriage. Rights are like names, whereas goods are like reality.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
