세무위험과 세금절감액의 사용

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to investigate whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) can lower tax risk. Previous studies have demonstrated a negative link between CSR and tax aggressiveness. Generally, corporations engaging in social irresponsibility tend to undertake aggressive tax planning; whereas socially responsible firms enjoy tax savings. Because several recent studies have suggested that lower tax payments do not necessarily create higher tax risk, an exploration of the relationship between CSR and tax risk was not only interesting but also important.Design/methodology/approachUsing an ethical perspective of CSR, this paper argues that executives who are nourished by an ethical climate tend to make responsible and reliable operating decisions. Therefore, their corporations would have better control of tax administration, and the corresponding tax risk would be constrained. Such corporations would enjoy greater tax savings while keeping their tax risk at relatively low levels. However, this reasoning ignores the fact that limited economic resources would constrain a firm from practicing CSR in the form of donations. This situation would also influence its attitude toward tax strategies. Specifically, when a firm’s performance is unsatisfactory, the cultural effect of CSR may diminish or even disappear.FindingsFirms donating additional resources to CSR activities can construct a more ethical work climate that encourages executives to control tax risk while lowering tax expenses. For firms with unsatisfactory performance, the ethical benefits of CSR could disappear, thus suggesting a relationship with firm performance. This finding contributes to the knowledge on the ethical implications of CSR and proposes that the culture argument is conditional on satisfactory firm performance.Originality/valueThis study explores the association between corporate culture (CSR) and tax risk. The empirical results help shareholders, analysts and other investors to make their business decision better because CSR or corporate culture is less likely to change suddenly or dramatically in an abbreviated time. The finding of this study shed light on the importance of corporate culture on making an investment evaluation or decision. In addition, this study extends the research on CSR by demonstrating that the effects of CSR are conditioned on firm performance. The beneficial effect of CSR on tax risk would disappear when firms have unfavorable financial performance.

Summaries of Papers in This Issue

This study examines the association between the effective corporate tax rate and the volatility of future effective corporate tax rates in Korean companies. We analyzed the effect of corporate governance on the association between tax avoidance and tax risk. Our sample is comprised of all the firms listed on the Korea Composite Stock Price Index market. We measure each firm’s tax avoidance as GAAP ETR, Cash ETR, and BTD, and use the corporate governance rating of the Korea Corporate Governance Service to measure corporate governance. Our results show that the volatility of the effective corporate tax rate and the effective corporate tax rate would have a significant negative association. Our results show that tax risk decreases when the corporate tax avoidance level increases and the tax risk increases when the corporate tax avoidance level decreases. In addition, we find that the better the corporate governance structure, the higher the level of supervision and control of managers, thereby mitigating the impact of tax evasion on future corporate tax risk. The findings of this study regarding tax avoidance and corporate governance are important for investors because tax risk can significantly affect investor welfare.

The advancement of digital transformation in tax administration and the rise of novel business models make firms increasingly recognise the strategic importance of integrating business and finance departments (referred to as ‘business-finance integration (BFI)’) in tax management. Our study analyzes recruitment data from Chinese A-share listed firms between 2014 and 2021 based on machine learning methods to identify the shift towards BFI and evaluate its impact on corporate tax management. We find that BFI significantly reduces tax avoidance. However, this effect is more pronounced in firms facing higher potential tax risks, such as those with complex organisational structures or greater exposure to tax audits. Additionally, BFI can reduce corporate tax risks. The conclusions indicate that BFI curbs corporate tax avoidance by reducing tax risks, thereby enhancing tax management efficiency. The findings provide significant theoretical and practical insights for promoting interdepartmental collaboration, advancing financial management, and improving tax management within firms.

Purpose This study examines the moderating effect of XBRL mandatory adoption on the association between managerial ability and corporate tax outcomes.Design/methodology/approach This study used a quantitative method with panel data regression models using a sample of listed firms on the Indonesia Stock Exchange from 2010 to 2019.Findings The regression results indicate that XBRL adoption moderates the relationship between managerial ability on tax avoidance and tax risk. Firms with higher managerial ability have relatively greater tax avoidance practices and lower tax risk following XBRL adoption. In this study, the authors document unfavorable and unexpected consequences of XBRL in an emerging country.Research limitations/implications Results are from a sample of firms from one emerging country.Practical implications It becomes important and necessary to develop more and better taxonomies with standardized extensions related to taxes information in the XBRL financial reporting to support the tax administrator’s performance in assessing firms’ tax avoidance and tax risk. The authors underscore the importance of improving taxes tags, including tags from financial statements and the disclosure section. This study may also inform policymakers in other countries that more adequate tax tags are needed to leverage benefit from XBRL adoption in monitoring and assessing corporate tax avoidance and tax risk.Originality/value This study is among the first to test an explanation for the moderating role of XBRL adoption on the association between managerial ability and corporate tax avoidance and tax risk.

Purpose This paper aims to explore the impact of tax avoidance on tax risk, and the moderating effect of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) performance on the relationship between tax avoidance and tax risk. Design/methodology/approach To test the two hypotheses, the authors applied feasible generalized least squares to a data set of French nonfinancial companies listed on the SBF120 index from 2008 to 2021. For robustness, alternative measures of tax avoidance, tax risk and ESG performance were used. Furthermore, the sample was split, and the regressions were run separately for companies with higher and lower ESG performance. Findings The findings of this study suggest that tax avoidance has a negative impact on tax risk. Moreover, the interaction between tax avoidance and ESG performance also leads to a reduction in tax risk. Further analysis shows that this negative impact of tax avoidance on tax risk is only evident for companies with higher ESG performance. As a result, French-listed companies with higher ESG performance are more likely to pursue safer tax avoidance strategies while minimizing riskier ones. Practical implications This study shows that French-listed firms with strong ESG performance are less likely to engage in risky tax avoidance practices. This finding is crucial for investors and creditors to make informed financial decisions. It also highlights the importance for policymakers to introduce additional ESG-related legislation that ensures better management of tax risks and enhances tax transparency within French companies. Social implications By improving their ESG performance, French-listed companies contribute to a more ethical and transparent tax system by promoting responsible tax avoidance and minimizing risky approaches. This promotes fairness and a more equitable society and has the potential to drive a cultural shift in which ethical tax strategies become the norm over time. Originality/value This study has focused on examining the relationship between tax avoidance and tax risk, a topic that has been little explored. In addition, while previous studies have examined the impact of corporate social responsibility on tax avoidance or tax risk, this study is original in that it examines the impact of ESG performance on the risk associated with tax avoidance.

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the interactive impact of tax avoidance and tax risk on the firm value.Design/methodology/approachThis study covers 290 observations on non-financial corporations listed on the Tunisian Stock Exchange for the period ranging from 2008 to 2020, using the multiple linear regression technique.FindingsThe results show that tax avoidance positively affects the firm value while tax risk has a negative influence on the company value. More importantly, tax risk moderates the positive impact of tax avoidance on the firm value. Accordingly, tax avoidance must be considered in conjunction with tax risk when studying the effect on the firm value. The findings of additional analyses indicate that when tax avoidance is associated with a high level of tax risk, it negatively affects the firm value. Thus, investors negatively rate the high-risk tax avoidance.Research limitations/implicationsThe major limitation of this study is that it focuses only on Tunisian listed companies since their financial statements are publicly available. Although the sample is relatively small due to the problem of data availability, it is satisfactory owing to the twelve-year sampling period (from 2008 to 2020). Research implications- The results obtained are of great interest to researchers as they should be more careful in simply using effective tax rates as a measure of risky or aggressive tax avoidance.Practical implicationsThe findings may signal the need for Tunisian firm managers to consider spillovers when adopting risky tax avoidance strategies and to implement a tax risk management policy within the firm. They are also substantial for Tunisian regulators to create requirements for reporting risky tax avoidance practices in the company annual reports to protect the investors’ rights and the society interest in general. The results are also useful for the investors who would like to make good decisions with respect to tax planning strategies. It is not enough to rely on the Effective Tax Rate (ETR) to judge whether or not tax planning is risky. Volatile ETRs, as a proxy of the tax risk, can be useful for them in decision-making.Social implicationsThe results also highlight that risky tax avoidance decreases the firm value, and thus confirm the negative repercussions that such behavior can have not only on the firm, but also on the society in general, as the corporate tax contributes to covering the State public expenditure. Hence, it is considered a general concern.Originality/valueThe present study differs from others in the existing literature. In fact, it examines the joint effect of tax avoidance and tax risk on the firm value for Tunisian listed companies which are characterized by the predominance of agency conflicts between major shareholders and minor ones. Therefore, the authors seek to investigate if small shareholders can penalize risky tax avoidance practices by decreasing the firm value.

Executive Inside Debt and Corporate Tax Avoidance

ABSTRACTThis study uses insights from tax practitioners and tax authorities to define and develop an estimate of ex ante tax risk that is independent of common tax outcomes studied in prior literature. Validation tests confirm that our tax risk measure (i) represents the predictable and unpredictable uncertainty inherent in the three sources of tax risk (i.e., economic risk, tax law uncertainty, and inaccurate information processing) and (ii) is a construct different from tax avoidance, tax uncertainty, and general business risk. Using our tax risk measure, we address two research questions of interest to academics and practitioners. First, we examine the association between tax risk and long‐run tax avoidance and find a negative association between tax risk and future long‐run cash effective tax rates (ETRs). Second, we consider the extent to which unrecognized tax benefits (UTBs) reflect tax risk, tax avoidance, or financial reporting incentives and demonstrate that our tax risk measure explains a substantial portion of UTBs, incremental and relative to measures of information risk, conditional conservatism, unconditional conservatism, and tax avoidance. Our study offers a measure of tax risk that, consistent with the Scholes‐Wolfson paradigm, reflects the tax risk inherent in all business activities, not just tax avoidance activities; has unique industry effects; and contributes to our understanding of the factors that affect tax planning decisions and result in variation in firms' ETRs. Our findings will help managers and tax practitioners focus on industry‐specific tax risk components, assess risk during tax planning initiatives, exercise caution when engaging in additional risk if ETRs are low, and adapt tax risk strategies to fit specific company needs. We enhance future tax research by improving the definition and measurement of tax risk.

ABSTRACTWe examine the “black box” of corporate tax risk management by providing unique insights into practitioners' tax risk perceptions, tax risk management practices, and influences leading to variation in tax risk management practices across firms. Opening this black box is important as tax risk has become an increasingly relevant aspect in corporate tax practice—little is yet known about how firms define and manage tax‐related risks. We perform our analysis based on 33 expert interviews, which we conducted with 42 tax risk experts. The first important finding from our interviews is that tax risk is a multifaceted and context‐dependent construct, consisting of six tax risk components: financial, reputational, compliance, political, tax process, and personal liability risk. Furthermore, we find that perceived tax risk varies substantially between corporate insiders and corporate outsiders. Our interview insights further reveal that firms' most frequently used tax risk management practices relate to some form of tax communication. The tax departments' rationale for using tax communication as a key tax risk management practice is to protect the firm—in particular, the CFO—from three types of pressure: public pressure, peer pressure, and regulatory pressure. Our analysis has important implications for future studies. First, our insights reveal that several tax risk components are not sufficiently covered by common tax risk measures used by the archival literature. Second, we find that communication has a key role in managing tax risk. This deviates from the purely supportive role that extant risk management frameworks have assigned to communication.

PurposeThis paper aims to examine the impact of tax avoidance on the cost of debt. It also investigates the effect of tax risk on the relationship between tax avoidance and the cost of debt.Design/methodology/approachTwo hypotheses are tested on a sample of nonfinancial French firms listed in the société des Bources Françaises 120 index from 2010 to 2022 using the feasible generalized least squares. To ensure the robustness of the findings, the authors changed the measures of tax avoidance and tax risk and used instrumental variable regression to effectively address concerns related to endogeneity. Additional analysis is conducted to examine if the relationship between tax avoidance and the cost of debt varies based on the magnitude of tax risk.FindingsThe authors found that tax avoidance negatively affects the cost of debt. However, when tax avoidance is associated with a high risk, it impacts positively the cost of debt.Practical implicationsThis study’s findings are relevant to firms, creditors and French lawmakers. Creditors must make their decision to grant credit based simultaneously on proxies of tax avoidance and tax risk. Managers must effectively manage tax risks to protect their financial decisions, urging French policymakers to implement new regulations on corporate tax risk management.Originality/valueTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is the first to have investigated the joint impact of tax avoidance and tax risk on the cost of debt in the French context.

Port machinery manufacturing has a long history in China and plays an important role in promoting the country's economic progress. Advanced port machinery not only enhances the ability of ports to handle goods, but also effectively cuts down on logistics expenses, thus solidly supporting the country's economic pulse. Against this background, preventing and dealing with the VAT tax risks faced by the port machinery manufacturing industry and improving tax compliance of taxpayers have become key issues. In this paper, a port machinery manufacturing enterprise in the stage of product upgrading and transformation is selected as the research object, and 2020 is taken as the benchmark, focusing on the tax situation of the enterprise in 2021 and 2022. In the case study of this enterprise, this paper adopts a tax-related risk model and longitudinal data analysis within the enterprise to identify in-depth the value-added tax (VAT) and corporate income tax (CIT) risks of the port machinery manufacturing enterprise, as well as the tax-related risks of the enterprise's investment and merger and acquisition business, so as to control the enterprise's tax risks and promote the sustainable development of the enterprise.

PurposeThis paper aims to study the impact of tax avoidance on corporate risk. It also examines the moderating impact of tax risk on the relationship between tax avoidance and firm risk.Design/methodology/approachBased on available information in the DATASTREAM database about a sample of French firms listed in the CAC 40 from 2010 to 2022, the study uses the feasible generalized least squares method to investigate the impact of tax avoidance on firm risk and the moderating impact of tax risk. To check the robustness of our results, the authors changed the measurement of variables to identify potential biases and they significantly mitigated the endogeneity concerns using instrumental variable regression. Additional estimations were performed, first by using book-tax differences (BTD) and its components, i.e. temporary and permanent, and second by retesting hypotheses of years before the outbreak of the corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.FindingsThe results show that tax avoidance negatively affects the firm risk while tax risk has a positive effect on firm risk. More importantly, tax risk moderates the negative impact of tax avoidance on the firm risk. When tax avoidance is associated with a high level of tax risk, it leads to a high firm risk. Accordingly, tax avoidance should be considered in conjunction with tax risk when studying the effect put on the firm risk. Further analyses indicate that tax risk moderates the negative relationship between permanent BTD and firm risk.Research limitations/implicationsThe major limitation of this study is that it focuses only on French-listed firms, which make it difficult to generalize the results. Furthermore, the authors did not introduce governance variables into our models. An effective governance system and transparent information can reduce some of the perverse effects of risky tax avoidance by reducing the tax avoidance costs. The obtained results are of great interest to researchers who need to include the tax risk concept in their examination of the tax avoidance impacts.Practical implicationsThe results are useful for investors wishing to make sound decisions regarding risky tax avoidance practices. Furthermore, the results may signal the need for French policymakers to make more efforts to reduce risky tax avoidance activities that are harmful to investors. They must enforce the existence and the reporting of a tax risk management strategy by firms.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the growing body of literature on the tax avoidance effects with a special focus on firm risk. This study provides the first French evidence of the role of tax risk in the relationship between tax avoidance and firm risk.

(1) Background: There are still few studies that discuss corporate tax risk, especially those related to tax compliance and the Slippery Slope Framework. Meanwhile, in practice, tax risk, which is tax uncertainty, is essential in corporate tax compliance. Tax risk has not been discussed in the Slippery Slope Framework in previous research, which has become a reference in various tax compliance studies. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the effect of tax risk induced into the slippery slope framework at corporate taxpayer compliance. Dynamic interactions between power, trust, and tax risk (TPR) in one framework are essential to see the tax compliance model’s determinants comprehensively; (2) Methods: We defined our model using a mathematical and economic approach with a Likert scale, as well as geometrical inferences based on the Slippery Slope Framework. (3) Results: This study found that tax risk affects the effort and tendency of corporate taxpayers to comply. The level of tax risk will make it easier or more difficult for corporate taxpayers to comply. Tax risk will affect the level of tax compliance regardless of the quality of trust and existing power; (4) Conclusions: This research’s theoretical contributions are that trust and power are determinants of tax compliance and that tax risk influences companies to be more compliant. This model is to complete the conceptual gap of the determinants of tax compliance from the perspective of the Slippery Slope Framework. The practical implication is that corporate taxpayers should manage tax risk to avoid unexpected tax outcomes in the future and be more compliant. Therefore, the government needs to help companies reduce compliance risks that cannot be controlled by companies but can be influenced by tax authorities.

Accounting conservatism reduces the book value of net assets and net income by early recognition of losses and postponed recognition of profits according to economic events. On the other hand, in the calculation of taxable income, the tax law has a delayed recognition of losses and an early recognition of profits, increasing taxable income gains for the current period. Due to the conflicted concepts between accounting conservatism and tax laws, accounting conservatism can reduce the volatility of corporate taxes in the future. Therefore, this study examines the relationship between accounting conservatism and the proxied tax risk for future five－years corporate tax volatility. First, as a result of analyzing the effect of conditional conservatism on tax risk, we find that there is a negative(－) relationship between conditional conservatism and tax risk. Second, as a result of analyzing the effect of unconditional conservatism on tax risk, we find that unconditional conservatism also has a negative(－) effect on tax risk. This result implies that the volatility of future corporate taxes is decreasing by the permanent difference to recognize expenses to underestimate the book value of net assets under unconditional conservatism. We suggest accounting conservatism as a means that can lower tax risk in the perspective of tax strategy. Specifically, in the real world, we shed light on the implications that tax risk can be managed by conservative accounting.