Abstract

The article is about the analysis of the problem of conflict in the context of pragmatic sociology. Pragmatic sociology based on the observation and description of the conflicts and the ways of justification used by conflicting parties. Oppose to classic sociology of class of P. Bourdieu pragmatic sociology dealing with the situation of conflict which reveal the real practices of classification. The tradition of pragmatic sociology proposes new definition of classification as a conflict emerges as a result of the collision of justification of the vision of social reality each of the parties. The conception of sociology of «cite» of Thevenot and Boltanski is exposed as a model of conflict’s solution and achievement of agreement in the public space. The methodology of «regimes of engagement» of Thevenot elaborates the ways of the overcoming the conflict in the private space through the establishment of the relations between things and people. The «regimes of engagement» form the materialistic conception of conflict when through the building the space of the common things it becomes possible to overcome the conflict and build res public of things and people as the infrastructure of freedom.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.