Abstract
Based on the contrastive research on Korean and Chinese comparatives, this paper examines the degree abstraction parameter (Beck et als. 2004), which has widely been accepted as an account for cross-linguistic variations of comparatives. This paper argues that both Korean and Chinese allow clausal comparatives as well as phrasal comparatives, thereby involving a comparison predicate either with ‘individual comparison’ or with ‘degree comparison’, which cannot be expected from the degree abstraction parameter. Despite sharing these essential characteristics, Chinese, in contrast to Korean, does not permit attributive comparatives nor it allows those with object comparison standards. These major contrasts rather should be explained by resorting to an individual morpho-syntactic feature of a certain element which participates in forming comparatives.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
