Abstract
The purpose of the study is to formulate an original approach to the systematization of investigative bodies, which should help establish acceptable rules for the distribution of criminal cases, including reducing the risks of duplication of the same procedural powers. Methodology: in preparing the article, general scientific methods (analysis, observation, generalization, comparison, description) and special methods of legal science were used. Conclusions. The author’s position is substantiated that the currently existing system of inquiry bodies should not be tied to the provisions of Part 1 of Art. 40 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, and considered as a legal phenomenon arising from the meaning of a number of other provisions of the criminal procedure law and other legislative and by-laws related to them. At the same time, the practical uselessness of Part 1 of Art. 40 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation, in connection with which a proposal was made to exclude it from the system of criminal procedural regulation. Scientific and practical significance. The results of the study will be useful to researchers and practitioners, teachers, graduate students (adjuncts), and students.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
