ДИВЕРСИФІКАЦІЯ ДЕРЖАВНОЇ ПОЛІТИКИ УПРАВЛІННЯ МІСЦЕВИМ ЕКОНОМІЧНИМ РОЗВИТКОМ

Abstract

The article raises the issues of identification of circumstances that pose a threat to local economic development in wartime conditions, and the possibility of their solution during post-war reconstruction by creating conditions by national and local institutions to achieve economic growth of the territorial communities of Ukraine. Goal: Coverage of the challenges facing territorial communities during the armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, as well as further restoration of the local economy; and the formation of practical recommendations for the diversification of the state policy of managing local economic development. The process of managing local economic development is characterized: 1) as a subject of political competition, 2) as an activity of the leadership of local governments, and the factors of its success are identified. The conceptual apparatus is clarified, the author's definition of the concept of «diversification of the state policy of managing local economic development» is given. A retrospective analysis of the state regional policy of Ukraine was carried out. Modern managerial approaches to territorial development are characterized and conclusions are drawn on the introduction of the security component of local economic development management in modern realities. Taking into account the tools of local economic development, directions for the diversification of state policy are proposed, among which are: identifying common features and problems for territorial approaches, assigning priority to their solution; finding a compromise between sustainable development, inclusive development and SMART-specialization in the development and implementation of a program for the restoration of communities and territories; updating and rethinking the strategic recovery plans of different hierarchical levels. A model for the diversification of the state policy of managing local economic development is presented as a compromise between coordination by the state and local economic development, which should be taken into account when restoring the potential of the territory. The authors see the prospects for the study in the formation of institutional and applied principles for the diversification of the state policy of managing local economic development.