Abstract
<p>Reducing the number of city-forming enterprises in single-industry towns leads to a decrease in the standard of living and migration of the population to other cities. From the economic point of view in many cases, the support of such cities is inappropriate, and there is a need to support the most rapid migration of the population to<br />more favorable cities. But on the other hand, the dispersal system in Russia is characterized by sparseness, and in many cases isolated monocities are important for the integrity of the territorial structure of the country. The article identifies the main factors that can<br />influence the increase in the attractiveness of single-industry towns for the population. This approach can be an effective tool for assessing the potential of single-industry urban settlements. Approbation of the proposed campaign in the Republic of Tatarstan<br />and the Kemerovo region made it possible to conclude that the strategic direction in the development of single-industry cities should be connected with the economic diversity of the city. Acceleration of economic growth, as well as sustainability of business can be<br />achieved by the development of small and medium-sized businesses</p>
Highlights
Reducing the number of city-forming enterprises in single-industry towns leads to a decrease in the standard
the dispersal system in Russia is characterized by sparseness
in many cases isolated monocities are important for the integrity of the territorial structure
Summary
При анализе рассмотрены города с численностью населения более 100 тысяч человек. По сумме номеров групп проведена классификация города по уровню привлекательности для населения. Наименьший уровень привлекательности присвоен городам при сумме 10 баллов и менее. Города с суммой по номерам групп более 10, но менее 16 отнесены к группе со средним уровнем привлекательности. Высокий уровень привлекательности имеют города с суммой 16 баллов и более. Наличие такой аналитической группировки дает возможность провести анализ взаимосвязи между выбранными факторами и результирующим показателем миграционного прироста населения. Значение уровня «низкий» встречается только по моногородам, по этим же городам показатель миграционного прироста населения имеет отрицательное значение. Для определения существенности связи был рассчитан коэффициент корреляции факторных признаков с показателем миграционного прироста населения в динамике (таблица 3). Распределение групп статистических показателей по городам Кемеровской области и Республики Татарстан Table 2.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Political, Sociological and Economic sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
