Abstract
The term “delinquency counteraction” is now often found on the pages of regulatory legal acts, scientific and educational publications, without having an unambiguous definition. Combining the activities of identifying, preventing, suppressing and investigating criminal acts committed in various spheres of society, minimizing harm caused by criminal activity, as well as prosecuting persons guilty of committing crimes, delinquency counteraction has indeed become a systemic concept in research of a separate type of law enforcement activity. In this regard the activities of officials of law enforcement and judicial bodies related to the preliminary investigation of crimes, criminal proceedings are considered as criminal procedural delinquency counteraction. Based on the analysis of the legal and empirical base, the existing theoretical views, the article substantiates the allocation of criminal procedural crime as a separate direction, identifies problematic issues of the beginning of its implementation, and also formulates conclusions and proposals for improving criminal procedural legislation from the standpoint of protecting rights and legal interests of participants in criminal procedural legal relations.
Highlights
In this regard the activities of officials of law enforcement and judicial bodies related to the preliminary investigation of crimes, criminal proceedings are considered as criminal procedural delinquency counteraction
Based on the analysis of the legal and empirical base, the existing theoretical views, the article substantiates the allocation of criminal procedural crime as a separate direction, identifies problematic issues of the beginning of its implementation, and formulates conclusions and proposals for improving criminal procedural legislation from the standpoint of protecting rights and legal interests of participants in criminal procedural legal relations
С учетом изложенного следует сделать вывод о возможности и обоснованности выделения в рамках противодействия преступности отдельного направления, а именно уголовно-процессуального противодействия преступлениям, а также о необходимости совершенствования правового регулирования уголовно-процессуальной деятельности с точки зрения обеспечения прав и законных интересов участников уголовно-процессуальных правоотношений
Summary
In this regard the activities of officials of law enforcement and judicial bodies related to the preliminary investigation of crimes, criminal proceedings are considered as criminal procedural delinquency counteraction. Данные, представленные в докладах Уполномоченного по правам человека в Российской Федерации и Фонда поддержки пострадавших от преступлений, свидетельствуют, с одной стороны, о системном характере проблем, возникающих в уголовном судопроизводстве в целом и на его первоначальных стадиях в частности, а с другой – о важной роли уголовно-процессуального противодействия преступлениям, сущность, понятие и значение которого будут проанализированы в данной статье.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
