Abstract
In this analytical review, pursuing the aim of investigating the history of forensic psychiatric assessment in civil proceedings at the V. Serbsky National Medical Research Centre for Psychiatry and Narcology, we analyze the impact of the evolution of legislative norms on the development of forensic expert practice and the emergence of new areas of scientific research. Based on the dynamic changes observed over time in the indices of the work carried out by the forensic-psychiatric expert service, as well as the bibliometric analysis of the publications by the staff of the V. Serbsky Centre, which identified the change in the number of scientific works dealing with the theoretical and methodological issues, and various subject types of forensic-psychiatric assessment in civil proceedings, we show the ambiguity of interrelation between the evolution of legislative norms, the alterations in forensic expert practice, and the directions of scientific research.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
