Abstract
Neuroscience development emphasizes the problem of the human’s free will. Results of neurobiological experiments are often interpreted as justification of the human’s lack of free will; S. Harris shares this viewpoint. However, analysis of discussions on free will that have unfolded in neuroscience and cognitive studies as well as critical analysis of arguments provided by neuroscience representatives - opponents of the free will doctrine - show that findings of modern neuroscience and cognitive studies do not contradict the postulate of free will as the subject’s inherent quality.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
