Abstract
the Ministry of the Interior of the Russian Federation, PhD (Law), Associate Professor Issues of compensation for moral damage have been the subject of scientific discussions since the early 1990s. The focus has always been on the issue of proving the level of emotional experiences, methods and forms of compensation for moral damage, and how the judge’s internal conviction is formed in resolving these issues. We substantiate that in practice, an apology is perceived as a form of compensation for moral harm and serves as a circumstance mitigating punishment by neutralizing the consequences of a criminal act, which is the reason for introducing amendments to the current legislation of Russia.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
