Abstract
The resource, transport, geopolitical significance of the Arctic zone in the current conditions of the crisis in the system of international relations is becoming a subject of rivalry on various platforms. Regional organizations (on the example of the Arctic Council, the Northern Forum), supranational international associations (SArctic), non-governmental organizations, communities, scientific institutions and other structures become tools for involving non-Arctic states in the Arctic agenda. At the level of strategic documents, the states fix the conceptual tasks of the presence in the Arctic, form programs of activities that ensure the presence. Among the eastern developed countries in the framework of this study is Japan, whose Arctic policy is analyzed by this study.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
