Мобилизация в Красную армию в освобожденных районах Кубани и Ставрополья в 1943 г.

Sera of inhabitants of the European part of Russia, collected in 2010-2013 were studied with the use of ELISA and neutralization test. Antibodies to West Nile virus were detected in 19.6% of cases in the Astrakhan region, 4.5% - in the Krasnodar region, 0.9% - in the Saratov region and 5.4% - in the Stavropol region. The coincidence of the results of the examination of sera in ELISA-IgG and neutralization test accounted of 80.7% in the Astrakhan region, 72.2% - in the Krasnodar region and 69.2% - in the Saratov region. The presented results correlate with the incidence and duration of known epidemiological activity of West Nile fever in the territories of these regions. Analysis of our data, as well as statistics of the morbidity rate of West Nile fever in the Volgograd and Rostov regions and Dagestan confirm endemic and expanding foci of this infection in the southern regions of Russia, currently including Astrakhan, Volgograd, Rostov, Saratov, Krasnodar and Stavropol regions and Dagestan. The most active and stable foci are located on the territory of Astrakhan, Volgograd and Rostov regions.

Book Review| April 01 1993 Review: National Archives and Records Administration: Pacific Southwest Region, by Diane Nixon, Suzanne J. Dewberry, Fred W. Klose, and Laura J. McCarthy National Archives and Records Administration: Pacific Southwest RegionDiane NixonSuzanne J. DewberryFred W. KloseLaura J. McCarthy Larry E. Burgess Larry E. Burgess Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar The Public Historian (1993) 15 (2): 198–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/3378001 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Larry E. Burgess; Review: National Archives and Records Administration: Pacific Southwest Region, by Diane Nixon, Suzanne J. Dewberry, Fred W. Klose, and Laura J. McCarthy. The Public Historian 1 April 1993; 15 (2): 198–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/3378001 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentThe Public Historian Search This content is only available via PDF. Copyright 1993 Regents of the University of California and the National Council on Public History Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content.

Track: Track 2: Interaction Better understanding of the relevance to ASIST members of the relationships among archives, knowledge management, libraries, and records management within organizations Proposals for collaborative activity between SIG MGT, SIG KM, and the Information Professional Task Force examining these relationships Topic: This session will explore the common and differential responsibilities among the functions of archives, knowledge management, library management, and records management, as represented by their professional organizations. These professions are often perceived to have distinct responsibilities: libraries for published information, records management for proprietary information, archives for “the non-current records of individuals, groups, institutions, and governments that contain information of enduring value” (using an SAA definition), and knowledge management in its tacit and explicit forms. From this viewpoint, libraries, records management, and archives' responsibilities are not overlapping, and are instead mutually exclusive. Moreover, it suggests that knowledge management supports these activities and even supplies information support not provided by libraries, records management, or archives. The session will examine how representatives of these information functions define them and how these conceptualizations can be applied, both separately and in collaboration with one another, so as to enhance research and practice. How should archives, knowledge management, librarianship, and the management of records be differentially defined? Why does this matter to researchers, to information professionals, or to managers? In light of this, how can SIG MGT, SIG KM, and the Information Professional Task Force coordinate their activities better? Description (180 minutes) This panel session will be moderated by Dr. Bill Edgar, the current chairperson of SIG MGT. The speakers will include guests from the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the Association of Records Managers and Administrators (ARMA), the Society of American Archivists (SAA), the Special Libraries Association (from a corporate library), as well as a researcher in knowledge management drawn from ASIST SIG KM membership. Their comments will be synthesized Dr. Julian Warner, a member of SIG HFIS. The speakers will address the Discussion Questions from their own viewpoint as well as that of their professional or scholarly society. Though SIG MGT has been inactive in recent years, it has the potential to be a forum for information professionals and researchers to discuss complex questions spanning multiple information professions and organizational environments. This session has the potential to revive interest in SIG MGT; it also provides an opportunity for ASIST members to advance the agenda of the ASIST Information Professionals Task Force across the information professions. The session will occur across two blocks, each block lasting 90 minutes, with the two separated by a coffee break. During the first 90 minutes, each speaker will discuss his or her thoughts on the Discussion Questions for approximately 12 minutes, ending with Dr. Warner's remarks. The second 90 minutes will be led by Dr. Sandy Hirsh, the current chairperson of the Information Professional Task Force. For the first 60 minutes attendees will split into groups to discuss the speakers' remarks, with the speakers and Dr. Hirsh rotating around the groups to facilitate discussions. Then Dr. Hirsh will lead a session-wide discussion for the final 30 minutes reviewing and integrating attendees comments. Moderator: Dr. Bill Edgar, Missouri State University [ASIST, SIG MGT] Speakers: Mr. Paul M. Wester, Jr., National Archives and Records Administration Mr. Peter Chiomenti, General Conference of Seventh Day Adventists. [ARMA, SAA] Mr. Chad Doran, Applied Physics Lab, John Hopkins University [ARMA] Dr. Sandra Hirsh, San Jose State University, [ASIST Information Professional Task Force] Dr. Julian Warner, Queen's University Belfast [ASIST SIG HFIS] Dr. Heather Day Pfeiffer, New Mexico State University [ASIST SIG KM] Ms. Deanna Hall, President, Corporate Information Resources, Inc.

Tushonka: Cultivating Soviet Postwar Taste

This article deals with the response of the Northern Ireland government to the presence of African American troops in the country during the Second World War, using extensive archival research at the Public Record Office of Northern Ireland, The National Archives at Kew and the National Records and Archives Administration in Maryland. It examines the pressures placed upon Stormont by both Westminster and, more particularly, the American military authorities in relation to U.S. racial mores. It demonstrates that despite edicts from London and attempts by the Americans to impose racial segregation, the Northern Ireland government fashioned a response which did not endorse ‘Jim Crow’ racism but, instead, dealt with the problem pragmatically and thoughtfully.

Viral diseases can seriously damage the vineyard productivity and the quality of grape and wine products. Therefore, the study of the species composition and range of grapevine viruses is important for the development and implementation of strategies and tactics to limit their spread and increase the economic benefits of viticulture. In 2014–2019, we carried out a large-scale phytosanitary monitoring of Russian commercial vineyards in the Krasnodar region, Stavropol region and Republic of Crimea. A total of 1857 samples were collected and tested for the presence of Grapevine rupestris stem pitting-associated virus (GRSPaV), Grapevine virus A (GVA), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus-1 (GLRaV-1), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus-2 (GLRaV-2), Grapevine leafroll-associated virus-3 (GLRaV-3), Grapevine fanleaf virus (GFLV), and Grapevine fleck virus (GFkV) using RT-PCR. Out of all samples tested, 54.5% were positive for at least one of the viruses (GRSPaV, GVA, GLRaV-1, GLRaV-2, GLRaV-3, GFLV, GFkV) in the Stavropol region, 49.8% in the Krasnodar region and 49.5% in the Republic of Crimea. Some plants were found to be infected with several viruses simultaneously. In the Republic of Crimea, for instance, a number of plants were infected with five viruses. In the Krasnodar region and the Republic of Crimea, 4.7% and 3.3% of the samples were predominantly infected with both GFkV and GRSPaV, whereas in the Stavropol region, 6% of the selected samples had both GLRaV-1 and GVA infections. We carried out a phylogenetic analysis of the coat protein genes of the detected viruses and identified the presence of GVA of groups I and IV, GRSPaV of groups BS and SG1, GLRaV-1 of group III, GLRaV-2 of groups PN and H4, GLRaV-3 of groups I and III. The results obtained make it possible to assess the viral load and the distribution of the main grapevine viruses on plantations in the viticultural zones of Russia, emphasizing the urgent need to develop and implement long-term strategies for the control of viral diseases of grapes.

The nation's memory the United States National Archives and Records Administration An Interview with Don W. Wilson, archivist of the United States, National Archives and Records Administration, Washington, DC 20408, USA

Journal of the History of the Behavioral SciencesVolume 26, Issue 3 p. 305-305 Book Review Timothy Walch, Ed. Our family, our town: Essays on family and local history sources in the national archives. Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, 1987. xvi + 223 pp. $30.00 (cloth) First published: July 1990 https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6696(199007)26:3<305::AID-JHBS2300260341>3.0.CO;2-JAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat No abstract is available for this article. Volume26, Issue3July 1990Pages 305-305 RelatedInformation

DOCUMERICA and the Power of Environmental History

The implementation of the UK Freedom of Information Act enhanced the transparency of the public records system because it changed how information held at The National Archives became available to the public. With the advent of the Act, the previously applied 30-year standard closure period no longer determined access to records; instead, information is now assumed to be ‘open’ right from the start unless one of the exemptions set out in the Freedom of Information Act applies. The aim of this paper is twofold: first, to describe the operational impact the Act has had on The National Archives; and second, to examine the way in which the Act has changed the role of the Lord Chancellor's Advisory Council on National Records and Archives within the context of performing a ‘checks and balances’ function in the public records system.

Congressional History: A Literature Review Get access Kenneth Kato, Kenneth Kato Kenneth Kato and Elizabeth Rybicki are Archives Specialists in Congressional History at the Center for Legislative Archives at the National Archives and Records Administration. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Elizabeth Rybicki Elizabeth Rybicki Kenneth Kato and Elizabeth Rybicki are Archives Specialists in Congressional History at the Center for Legislative Archives at the National Archives and Records Administration. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar OAH Magazine of History, Volume 12, Issue 4, Summer 1998, Pages 5–12, https://doi.org/10.1093/maghis/12.4.5 Published: 01 June 1998

Those Waterless, Sandy Valleys: Petition of the Moqui Women Get access Jean West, Jean West Jean West and Wynell Burroughs Schamel are Education Specialists with the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington, D.C. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Wynell Burroughs Schamel Wynell Burroughs Schamel Jean West and Wynell Burroughs Schamel are Education Specialists with the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington, D.C. Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar OAH Magazine of History, Volume 5, Issue 3, Winter 1991, Pages 46–47, https://doi.org/10.1093/maghis/5.3.46 Published: 01 January 1991

On 14 July 2017, the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) announced that it would shorten the time period for holding eleven kinds of noncitizen detainee records and invited public comment on these changes. NARA stated that the decision to recategorize many of these records as “temporary” was because they held “little or no research value.” The files included records of abuse, assault, and deaths of people in immigration detention. Curious how NARA valued research, we designed a project asking what could be learned—about abuse in detention and NARA—from these documents. This article describes our methodological approach and our findings and discusses the implications of both for future research on immigration, government archiving practices, and accountability. We submitted Freedom of Information Act requests for the eleven document types slated for earlier disposal and analyzed Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s documentation of neglect and abuse in immigration detention. To do so, we traced the documents’ intertextuality, showing how each document relied on—and further produced—other documents. Challenging NARA’s calculative logics, we show that disposing of these documents would widen gaps, holes, and silences in an already partial, state-centric archive, limiting which future histories of U.S. immigration policies might be told.

The U.S. National Archives and Records Administration's Electronic Records Archives (ERA), built to hold the avalanche of electronic records being created by the federal government of the United States, recently reached a major milestone. On September 30, 2011 ERA's initial development phase ended and the operations and maintenance phase began. Begun in 2005, ERA incrementally deployed important functions starting in 2008, when the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) started ingesting its existing collection of electronic records into ERA and piloting the records management functions that allow federal agencies to create records schedules and transfer their permanent electronic records to NARA.As of January 30, 2012 ERA was storing more than 131 terabytes of records in a wide variety of formats from the United States Congress, federal Agencies, and the George W. Bush White House. This volume is just the beginning of what ERA will manage and store, though. For example, NARA has recently received around 300 terabytes of electronic records from the 2010 Census, currently being prepared for ingest into ERA. NARA is relying on ERA every day to perform a key part of its basic mission, and ERA provides a flexible foundation on which NARA can build increasingly sophisticated functions over time.ERA's successes are critical to the mission of the archives, but the challenges the project encountered and the lessons NARA learned along the way may be more valuable to the digital preservation community. This paper will provide a summary of what ERA is and highlights of the project's accomplishments, but will also discuss important decision points in planning and development, external constraints, lessons learned from the experience, and challenges remaining in the future. Lessons learned include the importance of project governance, strategies for maintaining control of the project, and the necessity of constantly communicating to ensure that stakeholder expectations are realistic. Challenges included managing a large number of disparate requirements for records governed under different legal frameworks and working under the constraints of legally mandated timeframes for records ingest and access. NARA's response to these challenges involved a solution architecture that includes a common architectural pattern shared by different instances within a system of systems. NARA will be relying on this flexible software framework, along with standardized interfaces and data elements, to adapt ERA now that the system has moved out of initial development and into the operations and maintenance phase.

InterPARES: Securing the Future of Our Electronic Records