Abstract
In this article, the concepts of “dispositivity” and “imperative” are considered as methods of legal regulation from philosophical and legal positions. The author draws parallels with the presence of free will in the individual in the philosophical paradigm, identifying this state of affairs with the dispositive principle in law, and, on the contrary, reflects on determinism as a kind of orderliness inherent in the imperative method. The author's view on the correlation of the use of the previously mentioned methods in the current reality, from the point of view of their essential features, seems to be the most curious. Additionally, the question of the viability of one method in the absence of another is raised, similar to such philosophical trends as compatibilism and incompatibilism in relation to human freedom of expression.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
