Abstract

Introduction: the paper deals with the doctrinal principle of the inevitability of punishment and focuses on the possibility of implementing it in legal relations under penal enforcement law. The purpose of the paper is to identify how this interdisciplinary principle is respected in the enforcement of criminal sentences, and to propose mechanisms for its implementation. The study employs such methods as description, observation, statistical analysis, documentary analysis, induction, analogy, and thought experiment. Results: the paper reveals the fact that within the existing system of measures of negative and positive impact on the behavior of convicted persons, it is practically impossible to ensure the principle of the inevitability of punishment being implemented when it comes to sentences that are not related to isolation from society. Implementation of this principle in the execution of punishments related to isolation from society is not of legal but of organizational nature. Conclusions: the inability to execute a punishment in strict accordance with the requirements of the law leads to the loss of the deterrent value of punishment. When punishment is not related to isolation from society, convicts do not seek to serve the imposed punishment in strict accordance with the court verdict. As to the cases of serving a sentence related to isolation from society, there is a problem of unclear conditions for taking the most significant incentive measures in relation to a convicted person, such as substitution of the unserved part of the sentence and parole. The analyzed practice convincingly indicates that even if all the requirements of the law are fulfilled, petitions of convicts remain unsatisfied, while the courts refer to the fact that the goals of the punishment have not yet been achieved. Currently, in criminal and penal enforcement legislation there exist neither positive nor negative effective regulators aimed at facilitating strict and proper execution of the punishment imposed by the court.

Highlights

  • Results: the paper reveals the fact that within the existing system of measures of negative and positive impact on the behavior of convicted persons, it is practically impossible to ensure the principle of the inevitability of punishment being implemented when it comes to sentences that are not related to isolation from society

  • The doctrinal principle of the inevitability of punishment, which is interdisciplinary in nature, is mainly dealt with in criminal law and criminal procedure research

  • With regard to penal enforcement law, this principle is interpreted as follows: every punishment imposed by the court must be duly executed

Read more

Summary

УГОЛОВНОЕ ПРАВО И ПРОЦЕСС

А. Принцип неотвратимости наказания в уголовно-исполнительном праве: от декларирования к возможности реализации // Вестник Пермского университета. ПРИНЦИП НЕОТВРАТИМОСТИ НАКАЗАНИЯ В УГОЛОВНО-ИСПОЛНИТЕЛЬНОМ ПРАВЕ : ОТ ДЕКЛАРИРОВАНИЯ К ВОЗМОЖНОСТИ РЕАЛИЗАЦИИ. Введение: статья посвящена вопросу достижимости доктринального принципа неотвратимости наказания в уголовно-исполнительных правоотношениях. Цель: определить, как указанный принцип, имеющий междисциплинарный характер, реализуется при исполнении уголовных наказаний, и предложить механизмы его реализации. Результаты: выявлено, что при существующей системе мер негативного и позитивного влияния на поведение осужденных достижение действия принципа неотвратимости наказания практически невозможно при отбывании наказ аний, не связанных с изоляцией от общества. Реализация указанного принципа при исполнении наказаний, связанных с изоляцией от общества, имеет не правовую, а организационную природу. При отбывании наказания, связанного с изоляцией от общества, условия применения наиболее существенных для осужденного поощрительных мер, таких как замена неотбытой части наказания и условно-досрочное освобождение, не ясны. В настоящее время в уголовном и уголовно-исполнительном законодательстве отсутствуют эффек-

CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
Introduction
Literature Review
Определение Воронежского областного суда по делу
О внесении изменений в Уголовно-исполнительный кодекс Российской Федерации
Conclusion
43. Уголовный процесс: учебник
Findings
References in Russian
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.