Abstract
Prevention and counteraction to the actively growing number of economic crimes, in particular, new types of fraud related to the use of IT technologies, is largely complicated by a weak evidence base in judicial practice. The paper considers the manifestation of the unacceptable implementation of key judicial principles in the procedural activities of an expert and a specialist when they are involved in order to assist justice. The article analyzes the impact of unresolved gaps in the inter-procedural features of the participation of state and non-state experts, as well as the lack of a clear regulation of the procedural status of a specialist on the identified contradiction during the trial. To resolve the contradiction, it is proposed to reform the legislative framework in the relevant aspects.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
